Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 Oct;37(10):1620-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2298-x. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

Does femoral venous pressure measurement correlate well with intrabladder pressure measurement? A multicenter observational trial

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Does femoral venous pressure measurement correlate well with intrabladder pressure measurement? A multicenter observational trial

Bart L De Keulenaer et al. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate if femoral venous pressure (FVP) measurement can be used as a surrogate measure for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) via the bladder.

Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter observational study. IAP and FVP were simultaneously measured in 149 patients. The effect of BMI on IAP was investigated.

Results: The incidences of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) were 58 and 7% respectively. The mean APACHE II score was 22 ± 10, SAPS 2 score 42 ± 20, and SOFA score 9 ± 4. The mean IAP was 11.2 ± 4.5 mmHg versus 12.7 ± 4.7 mmHg for FVP. The bias and precision for all measurements were -1.5 and 3.6 mmHg respectively with the lower and upper limits of agreement being -8.6 and 5.7. When IAP was above 20 mmHg, the bias between IAP and FVP was 0.7 with a precision of 2.0 mmHg (lower and upper limits of agreement -3 and 4.6 respectively). Excluding those with ACS, according to the receiver operating curve analysis FVP = 11.5 mmHg predicted IAH with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.8 and 67.0% (AUC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.86) with P < 0.001). FVP = 14.5 mmHg predicted IAP above 20 mmHg with a sensitivity of 91.3% and specificity of 68.1% (AUC 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.91), P < 0.001). Finally, at study entry, the mean IAP in patients with a BMI less then 30 kg/m(2) was 10.6 ± 4.0 mmHg versus 13.8 ± 3.8 mmHg in patients with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: FVP cannot be used as a surrogate measure of IAP unless IAP is above 20 mmHg.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 - PubMed
    1. J Trauma. 1999 Jun;46(6):1009-14; discussion 1014-6 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2008 May 28;299(20):2413-22 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R631-5 - PubMed
    1. Diabet Med. 2005 May;22(5):554-62 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources