Multisensory object representation: insights from studies of vision and touch
- PMID: 21741551
- DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53752-2.00006-0
Multisensory object representation: insights from studies of vision and touch
Abstract
Behavioral studies show that the unisensory representations underlying within-modal visual and haptic object recognition are strikingly similar in terms of view- and size-sensitivity, and integration of structural and surface properties. However, the basis for these attributes differs in each modality, indicating that while these representations are functionally similar, they are not identical. Imaging studies reveal bisensory, visuo-haptic object selectivity, notably in the lateral occipital complex and the intraparietal sulcus, that suggests a shared representation of objects. Such a multisensory representation could underlie visuo-haptic cross-modal object recognition. In this chapter, we compare visual and haptic within-modal object recognition and trace a progression from functionally similar but separate unisensory representations to a shared multisensory representation underlying cross-modal object recognition as well as view-independence, regardless of modality. We outline, and provide evidence for, a model of multisensory object recognition in which representations are flexibly accessible via top-down or bottom-up processing, the choice of route being influenced by object familiarity and individual preference along the object-spatial continuum of mental imagery.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Vision and touch: multiple or multisensory representations of objects?Perception. 2007;36(10):1513-21. doi: 10.1068/p5850. Perception. 2007. PMID: 18265834
-
Vision holds a greater share in visuo-haptic object recognition than touch.Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 15;65:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.054. Epub 2012 Sep 29. Neuroimage. 2013. PMID: 23032487
-
Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: experimental and computational studies.Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):135-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Oct 25. Cognition. 2013. PMID: 23102553
-
Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation.Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 17;5:730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00730. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25101014 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Visual, haptic and cross-modal recognition of objects and scenes.J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):147-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.006. J Physiol Paris. 2004. PMID: 15477029 Review.
Cited by
-
Early blindness modulates haptic object recognition.Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 8;16:941593. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.941593. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36158621 Free PMC article.
-
The neural basis of tactile motion perception.J Neurophysiol. 2014 Dec 15;112(12):3023-32. doi: 10.1152/jn.00391.2014. Epub 2014 Sep 24. J Neurophysiol. 2014. PMID: 25253479 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping.Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;6:1403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01403. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26441777 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CROSSMODAL AND MULTISENSORY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN VISION AND TOUCH.Scholarpedia J. 2015;10(3):7957. doi: 10.4249/scholarpedia.7957. Scholarpedia J. 2015. PMID: 26783412 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Using data from cue presentations results in grossly overestimating semantic BCI performance.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 14;14(1):28003. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79309-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39543314 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources