Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Sep 15;108(6):838-44.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.037. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

Comparison of aerobic versus resistance exercise training effects on metabolic syndrome (from the Studies of a Targeted Risk Reduction Intervention Through Defined Exercise - STRRIDE-AT/RT)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of aerobic versus resistance exercise training effects on metabolic syndrome (from the Studies of a Targeted Risk Reduction Intervention Through Defined Exercise - STRRIDE-AT/RT)

Lori A Bateman et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Aerobic training (AT) improves the metabolic syndrome (MS) and its component risk factors; however, to our knowledge, no randomized clinical studies have addressed whether resistance training (RT) improves the MS when performed alone or combined with AT. Sedentary, overweight dyslipidemic men and women, aged 18 to 70 years completed a 4-month inactive run-in period and were randomized to 1 of 3 eight-month exercise programs (n = 196). The exercise programs were (1) RT (3 days/week, 3 sets/day of 8 to 12 repetitions of 8 different exercises targeting all major muscle groups); (2) AT (∼120 minutes/week at 75% of the maximum oxygen uptake), and (3) AT and RT combined (AT/RT) (exact combination of AT and RT). Of the 196 randomized patients, 144 completed 1 of the 3 exercise programs. The 86 participants with complete data for all 5 MS criteria were used in the present analysis, and a continuous MS z score was calculated. Eight months of RT did not change the MS score. AT improved the MS score (p <0.07) and showed a trend toward significance compared to RT (p <0.10). AT/RT significantly decreased the MS score and was significantly different from RT alone. In conclusion, RT was not effective at improving the MS score; however, AT was effective. Combined AT and RT was similarly effective but not different from AT alone. When weighing the time commitment versus health benefit, the data suggest that AT alone was the most efficient mode of exercise for improving cardiometabolic health.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00275145.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of screening and randomization inclusion and exclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of exercise modes on changes in (A) MS z score, (B) waist circumference (cm), (C) TG (mg/dl), (D) HDL (mg/dl), (E) mean arterial pressure (mm Hg), and (F) fasting plasma glucose (mg/dl). Error bars indicate SE. **p <0.05 and *p <0.10 compared to RT; p <0.10 compared to AT.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ATP III risk factor and MS prevalence before and after exercise intervention. MS defined as having 3 of 5 criteria: waist circumference (WC) ≥102 cm in men and ≥88 cm in women, blood pressure (BP) ≥130 mm Hg systolic or ≥85 diastolic, HDL cholesterol <40 mg/dl in men and <50 mg/dl in women, TG ≥150 mg/dl, and fasting plasma blood glucose (FBG) ≥100 mg/dl.

Comment in

  • Not all exercises are created equal.
    Paoli A, Bianco A. Paoli A, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jan 15;109(2):305. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.10.011. Am J Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22244130 No abstract available.

References

    1. Katzmarzyk PT, Leon AS, Wilmore JH, Skinner JS, Rao DC, Rankinen T, Bouchard C. Targeting the metabolic syndrome with exercise: Evidence from the heritage family study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1703–1709. - PubMed
    1. Lakka TA, Laaksonen DE. Physical activity in prevention and treatment of metabolic syndrome. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32:76–88. - PubMed
    1. Johnson JL, Slentz CA, Houmard JA, Samsa GP, Duscha BD, Aiken LB, McCartney JS, Tanner CJ, Kraus WE. Exercise training amount and intensity effects on metabolic syndrome (from studies of a targeted risk reduction intervention through defined exercise) Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1759–1766. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strasser B, Siebert U, Schobersberger W. Resistance training in the treatment of the metabolic syndrome. Sports Med. 2010;40:397–415. - PubMed
    1. Stensvold D, Tjonna AE, Skaug E-A, Aspenes S, Stolen T, Wisloff U, Slordahl SA. Strength training versus aerobic interval training to modify risk factors of metabolic syndrome. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:804–810. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data