MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage
- PMID: 21742787
- DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.100426
MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been frequently used to determine a preoperative treatment plan for gynecologic cancers. However, the MR accuracy for staging an endometrial cancer is not satisfactory based on the old FIGO staging system.
Purpose: To evaluate MR accuracy for staging endometrial cancer using the new FIGO staging system.
Material and methods: Between January 2005 and May 2009, 199 women underwent surgery due to endometrial cancer. In each patient, an endometrial cancer was staged using MR findings based on the old FIGO staging system and then repeated according to the new FIGO staging system for comparison. Histopathologic findings were used as a standard of reference.
Results: The accuracy of MRI in the staging of endometrial carcinoma stage I, II, III, and IV using the old FIGO staging system were 80% (159/199), 89% (178/199), 90% (179/199), and 99% (198/199), respectively, compared to 87% (174/199), 97% (193/199), 90% (179/199), and 99% (198/199), respectively, when using the new FIGO staging criteria. The overall MR accuracy of the old and new staging systems were 51% (101/199) and 81% (161/199), respectively.
Conclusion: MRI has become a more useful tool in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancers using the new FIGO staging system compared to the old one with increased accuracy.
Similar articles
-
[Magnetic resonance staging accuracy for endometrial carcinoma based on different FIGO staging systems].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 May 21;93(19):1486-9. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 24029574 Chinese.
-
[Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Sep;33(9):692-6. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011. PMID: 22340052 Chinese.
-
The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option.BJOG. 2008 Jun;115(7):894-901. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01716.x. BJOG. 2008. PMID: 18485169
-
MR staging of endometrial carcinoma.Clin Radiol. 2006 Oct;61(10):822-32. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.05.008. Clin Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16978977 Review.
-
The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging.Radiographics. 2012 Oct;32(6):1805-27. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125519. Radiographics. 2012. PMID: 23065170 Review.
Cited by
-
Ultrasound in gynecological cancer: is it time for re-evaluation of its uses?Curr Oncol Rep. 2015 Jun;17(6):28. doi: 10.1007/s11912-015-0449-x. Curr Oncol Rep. 2015. PMID: 25980344 Review.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Biomarkers for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Oncologist. 2019 Sep;24(9):e880-e890. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0117. Epub 2019 Jun 11. Oncologist. 2019. PMID: 31186375 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging across the life span: innovations in imaging and therapy for gynecologic cancer.Radiographics. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):1062-81. doi: 10.1148/rg.344130099. Radiographics. 2014. PMID: 25019442 Free PMC article.
-
Application of FLASH-3D dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma.Br J Radiol. 2016 Oct;89(1066):20160268. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160268. Epub 2016 Jul 26. Br J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27459248 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical