Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011;16(9):1239-49.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0024. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

Concordance of predictive markers for EGFR inhibitors in primary tumors and metastases in colorectal cancer: a review

Affiliations
Review

Concordance of predictive markers for EGFR inhibitors in primary tumors and metastases in colorectal cancer: a review

Jara M Baas et al. Oncologist. 2011.

Abstract

Background: Currently, only Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutational status is used as a decisional marker for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Concordance of KRAS status between primary tumors and metastases has always been considered to be close to perfect; however, cases of discordance have been reported. The actual rate of concordance of KRAS status remains unclear, as is the same for v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase CA subunit (PIK3CA), and loss of phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN). Therefore, it is unknown whether it is necessary to perform mutational analysis on metastases instead of on (or in addition to) primary tumors.

Design: A systematic literature search was conducted to collect all studies testing concordance of KRAS in CRC, and also of BRAF, PIK3CA, and loss of PTEN.

Results: Twenty-one studies have reported concordance of KRAS, with an overall concordance rate of 93% (range, 76%-100%). Overall concordance rates of studies testing concordance of BRAF status and loss of PTEN were 98% and 68%, respectively. Three studies reported concordance of PIK3CA status (range, 89%-94%).

Conclusion: Though discordance of KRAS status does occur, it is uncommon. When considering the downsides of testing metastatic tissue in all patients along with the low incidence of discordance, we conclude that that testing the primary tumor (or whatever tissue available) is sufficient for clinical decision making on EGFR inhibitor therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Jara M. Baas: None; Lisanne L. Krens: None; Henk-Jan Guchelaar: Research funding/contracted research: Amgen Inc, Merck BV; Hans Morreau: None; Hans Gelderblom: Research funding/contracted research: Amgen Inc, Merck BV.

The content of this article has been reviewed by independent peer reviewers to ensure that it is balanced, objective, and free from commercial bias. No financial relationships relevant to the content of this article have been disclosed by the independent peer reviewers.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
EGFR downstream pathways. Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, EGF receptor; ERK, extracellular signal-related kinase; GRB2, growth factor bound protein 2; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase–ERK kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten; SOS, son of sevenless; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; TGF-α, tumor growth factor α.

References

    1. Siena S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, et al. Biomarkers predicting clinical outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1308–1324. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rocha-Lima CM, Soares HP, Raez LE, et al. EGFR targeting of solid tumors. Cancer Control. 2007;14:295–304. - PubMed
    1. Laurent-Puig P, Lievre A, Blons H. Mutations and response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:1133–1139. - PubMed
    1. Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, et al. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2040–2048. - PubMed
    1. van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, et al. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1658–1664. - PubMed

MeSH terms