Word and Person Effects on Decoding Accuracy: A New Look at an Old Question
- PMID: 21743750
- PMCID: PMC3129854
- DOI: 10.1037/a0023001
Word and Person Effects on Decoding Accuracy: A New Look at an Old Question
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on decoding by bringing together two lines of research, namely person and word factors that affect decoding, using a crossed random-effects model. The sample was comprised of 196 English-speaking grade 1 students. A researcher-developed pseudoword list was used as the primary outcome measure. Because grapheme-phoneme correspondence (GPC) knowledge was treated as person and word specific, we are able to conclude that it is neither necessary nor sufficient for a student to know all GPCs in a word before accurately decoding the word. And controlling for word-specific GPC knowledge, students with lower phonemic awareness and slower rapid naming skill have lower predicted probabilities of correct decoding than counterparts with superior skills. By assessing a person-by-word interaction, we found that students with lower phonemic awareness have more difficulty applying knowledge of complex vowel graphemes compared to complex consonant graphemes when decoding unfamiliar words. Implications of the methodology and results are discussed in light of future research.
Figures
References
-
- Abu-Rabia S, Share D, Mansour MS. Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing. 2003;16:423–442.
-
- Adams RJ, Wilson M, Wu M. Multilevel item response models: An approach to errors in variables regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 1997;22:47–76.
-
- Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;59:390–412.
-
- Baddeley AD. Working Memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1986.
-
- Baddeley A, Gathercole S, Papagno C. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review. 1998;105:158–173. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources