Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;38(4):640-653.
doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.09.005.

Language context elicits native-like stop voicing in early bilinguals' productions in both L1 and L2

Mark Antoniou  1 , Catherine T Best, Michael D Tyler, Christian Kroos
Affiliations

Language context elicits native-like stop voicing in early bilinguals' productions in both L1 and L2

Mark Antoniou et al. J Phon. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

The way that bilinguals produce phones in each of their languages provides a window into the nature of the bilingual phonological space. For stop consonants, if early sequential bilinguals, whose languages differ in voice onset time (VOT) distinctions, produce native-like VOTs in each of their languages, it would imply that they have developed separate first and second language phones, that is, language-specific phonetic realisations for stop-voicing distinctions. Given the ambiguous phonological status of Greek voiced stops, which has been debated but not investigated experimentally, Greek-English bilinguals can offer a unique perspective on this issue. We first recorded the speech of Greek and Australian-English monolinguals to observe native VOTs in each language for /p, t, b, d/ in word-initial and word-medial (post-vocalic and post-nasal) positions. We then recorded fluent, early Greek-Australian-English bilinguals in either a Greek or English language context; all communication occurred in only one language. The bilinguals in the Greek context were indistinguishable from the Greek monolinguals, whereas the bilinguals in the English context matched the VOTs of the Australian-English monolinguals in initial position, but showed some modest differences from them in the phonetically more complex medial positions. We interpret these results as evidence that bilingual speakers possess phonetic categories for voiced versus voiceless stops that are specific to each language, but are influenced by positional context differently in their second than in their first language.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Positive VOT reported, denoted by +p.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Negative VOT reported, denoted by −b.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Greek and English word-initial mean VOTs produced by Greek and English monolinguals and bilinguals in Greek and English language modes.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean VOTs of Greek and English word-medial oral stops produced by Greek and English monolinguals and bilinguals in Greek and English language modes.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Segmenting the nasal (m) and prevoicing (−b) of the Greek nasal + voiced stop [ˈamba].
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mean VOTs of Greek and English word-medial nasal stops produced by Greek and English monolinguals and bilinguals in Greek and English language modes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Appel R, Muysken P. Language contact and bilingualism. Baltimore: Edward Arnold; 1987.
    1. Arvaniti A. Greek voiced stops: Prosody, syllabification, underlying representations or selection of the optimal?. Proceedings of the 3rd international linguistics conference for the Greek language; Athens. Ellinika Grammata; 1999. pp. 383–390.
    1. Arvaniti A. The phonetics of stress in Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics. 2000;1:9–39.
    1. Arvaniti A. Greek phonetics: The state of the art. Journal of Greek Linguistics. 2007;8:97–208.
    1. Arvaniti A, Joseph BD. Variation in voiced stop prenasalization in Greek. Glossologia. 2000;11–12:131–166.

LinkOut - more resources