Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Sep;137(9):1337-42.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-011-1003-3. Epub 2011 Jul 9.

Updated survival analysis in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer receiving BLP25 liposome vaccine (L-BLP25): phase IIB randomized, multicenter, open-label trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Updated survival analysis in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer receiving BLP25 liposome vaccine (L-BLP25): phase IIB randomized, multicenter, open-label trial

Charles Butts et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To present an updated survival analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase IIB trial of BLP25 liposome vaccine (L-BLP25) in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Patients were randomized to either L-BLP25 plus best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone. Patients in the L-BLP25 arm received subcutaneous vaccinations of L-BLP25 930 μg weekly for 8 weeks, followed by maintenance vaccinations at 6-week intervals.

Results: Median survival time was 4.2 months longer in patients receiving L-BLP25 plus BSC (n = 88) than in those receiving BSC alone (n = 83; 17.2 months vs. 13.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 0.745, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.533-1.042). The 3-year survival rate was 31% in patients receiving L-BLP25 plus BSC and 17% in those receiving BSC (P = 0.035). In the stratified subset of patients with stage IIIB loco-regional (LR) disease, median survival time was 17.3 months longer in patients receiving L-BLP25 plus BSC (n = 35) than in those receiving BSC (n = 30; 30.6 months vs. 13.3 months, respectively; HR 0.548, 95% CI 0.301-0.999). In this subgroup, 3-year survival was 49% in patients receiving L-BLP25 plus BSC and 27% in those receiving BSC (P = 0.070).

Conclusions: Confirming the initial results, further follow-up continues to show that survival time for patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC was longer with L-BLP25 plus BSC compared with BSC alone, with the greatest difference seen in patients with stage IIIB LR disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Frank Beier is employed as a Senior Biostatistician at Merck KGaA in Darmstadt. Martin Falk is an employee of Merck KGaA. Charles Butts has provided consultancy and served on Speakers' Bureaux for Merck Serono.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall survival in L-BLP25 and best supportive care (BSC) treatment arms after extended follow-up in a total patient group, b stage IIIB MPE/IV subgroup, and c stage IIIB LR subgroup (Survival based on Kaplan–Meier estimates) BSC best supportive care, CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, LR loco-regional, MPE malignant pleural effusion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Three-year survival rates (% patients surviving) in the total patient population, patients with stage IIIB MPE/IV disease, and patients with stage IIIB LR disease BSC best supportive care, LR loco-regional, MPE malignant pleural effusion. P-values are descriptive statistics for chi-square testing comparing 3-year survival rates with L-BLP25 and BSC

References

    1. Albain KS, Crowley JJ, Turrisi AT, Gandara DR, Farrar WB, Clark JI, Beasley KR, Livingston RB (2002) Concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, and chest radiotherapy in pathologic stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II study, SWOG 9019. J Clin Oncol 20:3454–3460 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butts C, Murray N, Maksymiuk A, Goss G, Marshall E, Soulieres D, Cormier Y, Ellis P, Price A, Sawhney R, Davis M, Mansi J, Smith C, Vergidis D, Ellis P, MacNeil M, Palmer M (2005) Randomized phase IIB trial of BLP25 liposome vaccine in stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:6674–6681 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butts C, Murray RN, Smith CJ, Ellis PM, Jasas K, Maksymiuk A, Goss G, Ely G, Beier F, Soulières D (2010) A multicenter open-label study to assess the safety of a new formulation of BLP25 liposome vaccine in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 11:391–395 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ClinicalTrials.gov (2010) Cancer vaccine study for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Available at: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Accessed Feb 2011
    1. Crino L, Weder W, van Meerbeeck J, Felip E (2010) Early stage and locally advanced (non-metastatic) non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v103–v115 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms