Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;34(11):1468-74.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03165.x.

Assessment of atrial conduction time in patients with coronary artery ectasia

Affiliations

Assessment of atrial conduction time in patients with coronary artery ectasia

Cihan Sengul et al. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is associated with increased sympathetic activity, plasma levels of inflammatory markers, and oxidative stress. These factors can also cause arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation. Atrial conduction abnormalities in patients with CAE have not been investigated in terms of atrial electromechanical delay obtained by tissue Doppler echocardiography.

Methods: Ninety patients with pure CAE (n = 30), nonobstructive coronary artery disease (NO-CAD) (n = 30), and angiographically normal coronary arteries "controls" (n = 30) were compared in terms of electrocardiographic P-wave measurements, echocardiographic atrial electromechanical coupling (AEC) parameters, and interatrial conduction delay.

Results: The mean left atrium diameter in the CAE group was similar to the NO-CAD group but significantly greater than the control group (3.62 ± 0.28 vs 3.46 ± 0.32 vs 3.41 ± 0.31 cm, P = 0.021). P maximum and P-wave dispersion were significantly increased in the CAE group compared to the NOCAD group and the control group (108.6 ± 6.6 vs 97.9 ± 6.6 vs 93.5 ± 6.2, P = 0.0001; 34.4 ± 7.6 vs 23.2 ± 7.8 vs 19.4 ± 7.7 ms, P < 0.0001). Mitral AEC, septal AEC, and tricuspid AEC were significantly higher in the CAE group than the NO-CAD group and the control group (68 ± 4.5 vs 57 ± 4.5 vs 53 ± 4.6 ms, P < 0.0001; 50.7 ± 7 vs 42.7 ± 7 vs 41.7 ± 7.2 ms, P = 0.0001; 47 ± 6.7 vs 39.1 ± 6.7 vs 38.1 ± 6.6 ms, P < 0.0001). Interatrial conduction delay was significantly increased in the CAE group compared to the NO-CAD group and the control group (21 ± 5.5 vs 17.8 ± 5.6 vs 15 ± 5.6 ms, P < 0.0001).The correlation analysis demonstrated that the interatrial conduction delay and P-wave dispersion (Pd) were positively correlated with number of ectatic segments (ESN) (r = 0.41, P = 0.024 vs r = 0.49, P = 0.006). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the ESN was the only independent determinants of interatrial conduction delay (P = 0.024).

Conclusion: Pd and interatrial conduction delay are prolonged in patients with CAE compared to NO-CAD patients and the healthy controls.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources