Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Aug 10;29(23):3153-62.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0092. Epub 2011 Jul 11.

Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity at chromosomal location 18q: prospective evaluation of biomarkers for stages II and III colon cancer--a study of CALGB 9581 and 89803

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity at chromosomal location 18q: prospective evaluation of biomarkers for stages II and III colon cancer--a study of CALGB 9581 and 89803

Monica M Bertagnolli et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) develops as a result of a series of accumulated genomic changes that produce oncogene activation and tumor suppressor gene loss. These characteristics may classify CRC into subsets of distinct clinical behaviors.

Patients and methods: We studied two of these genomic defects-mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) and loss of heterozygosity at chromosomal location 18q (18qLOH)-in patients enrolled onto two phase III cooperative group trials for treatment of potentially curable colon cancer. These trials included prospective secondary analyses to determine the relationship between these markers and treatment outcome. A total of 1,852 patients were tested for MMR status and 955 (excluding patients with MMR-D tumors) for 18qLOH.

Results: Compared with stage III, more stage II tumors were MMR-D (21.3% v 14.4%; P < .001) and were intact at 18q (24.2% v 15.1%; P = .001). For the combined cohort, patients with MMR-D tumors had better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS; 0.76 v 0.67; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; 0.81 v 0.78; P = .029) than those with MMR intact (MMR-I) tumors. Among patients with MMR-I tumors, the status of 18q did not affect outcome, with 5-year values for patients with 18q intact versus 18qLOH tumors of 0.74 versus 0.65 (P = .18) for DFS and 0.81 versus 0.77 (P = .18) for OS.

Conclusion: We conclude that MMR-D tumor status, but not the presence of 18qLOH, has prognostic value for stages II and III colon cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram, Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9581.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
CONSORT diagram, Cancer and Leukemia Group B 89803. CPT-11, irinotecan; FU, fluorouracil; LV, leucovorin.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Association between marker status and treatment outcome. Results of analysis examining association between mismatch repair (MMR) and 18q status and protocol treatment outcome (disease-free survival [DFS] and overall survival [OS] denote Kaplan-Meier estimates at 5 years; P values are associated with the log-rank test). Cohorts included (A) stage II patients treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9581, (B) stage III patients treated on CALGB 89803, and (C) stage II and III patients treated on either CALGB 9581 or 89803. 18qLOH, loss of heterozygosity at chromosomal location 18q; MMR-D, mismatch repair deficiency; MMR-I, mismatch repair intact.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Kaplan-Meier estimates for the combined data set of stage II (Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB] 9581) and stage III (CALGB 89803) patients, representing comparisons between different marker-defined subsets. (A) Overall survival (OS; all-cause death) by mismatch repair (MMR) status (log-rank P = .029); (B) disease-free survival (DFS; documented recurrence of primary colon cancer or death as a result of any cause) by MMR status (log-rank P < .001); (C) OS by 18q status (log-rank P = .32); (D) DFS by 18q status (log-rank P = .39); (E) OS by 18q status with MMR deficiency (MMR-D) included among 18q intact (log-rank P = .021); (F) DFS by 18q status with MMR-D included among 18q intact (log-rank P = .002). 18qLOH, loss of heterozygosity at chromosomal location 18q; MMR-I, mismatch repair intact.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:525–532. - PubMed
    1. Sargent DJ, Marsoni S, Monges G, et al. Defective mismatch repair as a predictive marker for lack of efficacy of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy in colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3219–3226. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thibodeau S, Bren G, Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science. 1993;260:616–619. - PubMed
    1. Watanabe T, Wu TT, Catalano PJ, et al. Molecular predictors of survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1196–1208. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Samowitz WS, Curtin K, Ma KN, et al. Microsatellite instability in sporadic colon cancer is associated with an improved prognosis at the population level. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:917–932. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding