Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein with sapheno-femoral ligation compared to standard stripping: a prospective clinical study
- PMID: 21747350
Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein with sapheno-femoral ligation compared to standard stripping: a prospective clinical study
Abstract
Aim: This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein (GSV) combined with sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) ligation to standard stripping surgery. Primary endpoints were patient recovery period, postoperative pain, quality of life and recurrence rate and secondary end points were frequency of complications on the two arms of the trial.
Methods: Sixty consecutive patients with incompetence of the GSV resulting in varicose veins were prospectively randomized into 2 groups of 30, treated by SFJ ligation and either ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy or standard stripping of the GSV. The study protocol included history, physical examination, assignment of CEAP class, assessment of the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) and colour Duplex ultrasound.
Results: All treatments were completed as intended. The time taken to complete treatment was shorter in the foam sclerotherapy plus SFJ ligation group as compared to standard stripping: 43 min vs. 65 min (P<0.01, Mann-Whitney). Less analgesic use postoperatively was recorded in the foam sclerotherapy group. Median time to return to normal activities was significantly reduced in the foam sclerotherapy group (3 days) compared to the surgical group (6 days) (P<0.01, Mann-Whitney). The median overall cost of the procedure in the sclerotherapy group was 3143RMB, and was 3638RMB in the conventional surgery (P=0.235, Mann-Whitney). At 3 months, median CEAP class dropped from four preoperatively to one following treatment in both groups (p<0.01, Wilcoxon test). After 6 months, in the foam sclerotherapy group five patients (20%) needed further sessions of foam sclerotherapy, resulting in a short-term closure rate of 80%. And the short-term obliteration rate was 89.5% in the conventional surgery group.
Conclusion: Ultrasound guided sclerotherapy combined with sapheno-femoral ligation involved a shorter treatment time, less postoperative discomfort and resulted in more rapid recovery compared to conventional GSV stripping.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy combined with sapheno-femoral ligation compared to surgical treatment of varicose veins: early results of a randomised controlled trial.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Jan;31(1):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.08.024. Epub 2005 Oct 17. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 16233981 Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective Randomized Study of Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy Combined with Great Saphenous Vein High Ligation in the Treatment of Severe Lower Extremity Varicosis.Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;39:256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Sep 23. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 27671459 Clinical Trial.
-
Reverse foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein with sapheno-femoral ligation compared to standard and invagination stripping: a prospective clinical series.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Oct;36(4):485-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.029. Epub 2008 Aug 20. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18718769 Clinical Trial.
-
Radiofrequency minimally invasive endovascular treatment of lower limbs varicose veins: clinical experience and literature review.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007 Aug;55(4):443-58. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007. PMID: 17653021 Review. English, Italian.
-
Which endovenous ablation method does offer a better long-term technical success in the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein? Review.Vascular. 2016 Dec;24(6):649-657. doi: 10.1177/1708538116648035. Epub 2016 Apr 28. Vascular. 2016. PMID: 27126643 Review.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of Sclerotherapy to Cure Lower Limb Chronic Venous Insufficiency Grades 1-6: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2023 Dec 1;15(12):e49770. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49770. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38164304 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interventions for great saphenous vein reflux: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Br J Surg. 2021 Apr 5;108(3):244-255. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa101. Br J Surg. 2021. PMID: 33793723 Free PMC article.
-
Health economic evaluations of medical devices in the People's Republic of China: A systematic literature review.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Apr 9;7:195-204. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S78752. eCollection 2015. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015. PMID: 25914551 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical