Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;40(5):1247-60.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr115. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

Childhood cancer and nuclear power plants in Switzerland: a census-based cohort study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Childhood cancer and nuclear power plants in Switzerland: a census-based cohort study

Ben D Spycher et al. Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Previous studies on childhood cancer and nuclear power plants (NPPs) produced conflicting results. We used a cohort approach to examine whether residence near NPPs was associated with leukaemia or any childhood cancer in Switzerland.

Methods: We computed person-years at risk for children aged 0-15 years born in Switzerland from 1985 to 2009, based on the Swiss censuses 1990 and 2000 and identified cancer cases from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. We geo-coded place of residence at birth and calculated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the risk of cancer in children born <5 km, 5-10 km and 10-15 km from the nearest NPP with children born >15 km away, using Poisson regression models.

Results: We included 2925 children diagnosed with cancer during 21 117 524 person-years of follow-up; 953 (32.6%) had leukaemia. Eight and 12 children diagnosed with leukaemia at ages 0-4 and 0-15 years, and 18 and 31 children diagnosed with any cancer were born <5 km from a NPP. Compared with children born >15 km away, the IRRs (95% CI) for leukaemia in 0-4 and 0-15 year olds were 1.20 (0.60-2.41) and 1.05 (0.60-1.86), respectively. For any cancer, corresponding IRRs were 0.97 (0.61-1.54) and 0.89 (0.63-1.27). There was no evidence of a dose-response relationship with distance (P > 0.30). Results were similar for residence at diagnosis and at birth, and when adjusted for potential confounders. Results from sensitivity analyses were consistent with main results.

Conclusions: This nationwide cohort study found little evidence of an association between residence near NPPs and the risk of leukaemia or any childhood cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Maps showing sites of nuclear facilities and population density in Switzerland. Locations of NPPs, research facilities, the interim storage facility and sites where NPPs were planned but never built (upper map) and population density in 2000 in quintiles (lower map) NPP, nuclear power plant; EPFL, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; Uni, University; PSI, Paul Scherrer Institute
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart of selection of children with childhood cancer
Figure 3
Figure 3
Results for birth cohort. Incidence rate ratios adjusted for sex, age and year at diagnosis and 95% CIs comparing children living in the inner 5 km, 5–10 km and 10–15 km zones with children outside the 15 km zone. Results for nuclear power plants (NPPs); any nuclear facility including NPPs, research and storage facilities; and sites of planned but not built NPPs are shown
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results for resident cohort. Incidence rate ratios adjusted for sex, age and year at diagnosis and 95% CIs comparing children living in the inner 5 km, 5–10 km and 10–15 km zones with children outside the 15 km zone. Results for nuclear power plants (NPPs); any nuclear facility including NPPs, research and storage facilities; and sites of planned but not built NPPs are shown
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of results of main and sensitivity analyses. Incidence rate ratios adjusted for sex, age and year at diagnosis and 95% CIs comparing children living <5 km with children living >15 km from a nuclear power plant. Results are shown for the birth cohort and are adjusted for sex, age and year at diagnosis. Analyses numbered as in Box 1

Comment in

References

    1. Black D. Investigation of the Possible Increased Incidence of Cancer in West Cumbria; Report of the Independent Advisory Group. London: HMSO; 1984.
    1. Michaelis J, Keller B, Haaf G, Kaatsch P. Incidence of childhood malignancies in the vicinity of west German nuclear power plants. Cancer Causes Control. 1992;3:255–63. - PubMed
    1. Cook-Mozaffari P, Darby S, Doll R. Cancer near potential sites of nuclear installations. Lancet. 1989;2:1145–47. - PubMed
    1. Spix C, Schmiedel S, Kaatsch P, Schulze-Rath R, Blettner M. Case-control study on childhood cancer in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Germany 1980-2003. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:275–84. - PubMed
    1. Kaatsch P, Spix C, Schulze-Rath R, Schmiedel S, Blettner M. Leukaemia in young children living in the vicinity of German nuclear power plants. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:721–26. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances