Effectiveness of vertebroplasty using individual patient data from two randomised placebo controlled trials: meta-analysis
- PMID: 21750078
- PMCID: PMC3133975
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d3952
Effectiveness of vertebroplasty using individual patient data from two randomised placebo controlled trials: meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether vertebroplasty is more effective than placebo for patients with pain of recent onset (≤ 6 weeks) or severe pain (score ≥ 8 on 0-10 numerical rating scale).
Design: Meta-analysis of combined individual patient level data.
Setting: Two multicentred randomised controlled trials of vertebroplasty; one based in Australia, the other in the United States.
Participants: 209 participants (Australian trial n = 78, US trial n = 131) with at least one radiographically confirmed vertebral compression fracture. 57 (27%) participants had pain of recent onset (vertebroplasty n = 25, placebo n = 32) and 99 (47%) had severe pain at baseline (vertebroplasty n = 50, placebo n = 49).
Intervention: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus a placebo procedure.
Main outcome measure: Scores for pain (0-10 scale) and function (modified, 23 item Roland-Morris disability questionnaire) at one month.
Results: For participants with pain of recent onset, between group differences in mean change scores at one month for pain and disability were 0.1 (95% confidence interval -1.4 to 1.6) and 0.2 (-3.0 to 3.4), respectively. For participants with severe pain at baseline, between group differences for pain and disability scores at one month were 0.3 (-0.8 to 1.5) and 1.4 (-1.2 to 3.9), respectively. At one month those in the vertebroplasty group were more likely to be using opioids.
Conclusions: Individual patient data meta-analysis from two blinded trials of vertebroplasty, powered for subgroup analyses, failed to show an advantage of vertebroplasty over placebo for participants with recent onset fracture or severe pain. These results do not support the hypothesis that selected subgroups would benefit from vertebroplasty.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Figures
Comment in
-
Vertebroplasty for vertebral fracture.BMJ. 2011 Jul 12;343:d3470. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3470. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21750076 No abstract available.
-
Meta-analysis: vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fracture ineffective in improving pain and function.Evid Based Med. 2012 Oct;17(5):142-3. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2011-100215. Epub 2011 Nov 1. Evid Based Med. 2012. PMID: 22044795 No abstract available.
References
-
- Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 2009;361:557-68. - PubMed
-
- Baerlocher MO, Munk PL, Liu DM. Trials of vertebroplasty for vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2098; author reply 2099-100. - PubMed
-
- Baerlocher MO, Munk PL, Liu DM, Tomlinson G, Badii M, Kee ST, et al. Clinical utility of vertebroplasty: need for better evidence. Radiology 2010;255:669-74. - PubMed
-
- Baerlocher MO, Munk PL, Radvany MG, Murphy TP, Murphy KJ. Vertebroplasty, research design, and critical analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:1277-8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical