Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars
- PMID: 21752507
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.097
Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to adjust a multivariate model to explain each of the response variables for the occurrence of surgical difficulty during the removal of impacted lower third molars.
Patients and methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out involving patients submitted to at least one surgical removal of an impacted lower third molar. A total of 285 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and 473 surgeries were performed. Preoperative variables indicative of surgical difficulty were recorded. All surgical procedures were performed under the same conditions by two surgeons who were unaware of the data collected in the pre-selection phase. Either Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for the data analysis (P<5.0%).
Results: Root number (P((1)) < 0.004*) and morphology (P((1)) < 0.031*), tooth position (P((1)) = 0.001*), periodontal space (P((2)) < 0.004*) and second molar relation (P((1)) = 0.001*) were significant predictors of surgical difficulty, whereas patient age (P((1)) = 0.097), gender (P((1)) = 0.470), body mass index (P((1)) = 0.719), associated pathologies (P((1)) = 0.237), relation with mandibular canal (P((1)) = 0.384) and width of 3rd molar crown (P((1)) = 0.154) were not significant predictors.
Conclusion: Many factors contribute to surgical difficulty, but considering these factors individually, some are only determinants of either difficulty or complications. Thus, not all significant predictors of surgical difficulty should be considered indicators of complications.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted maxillary third molars.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 May;71(5):839-45. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.01.001. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23598549
-
Difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar tooth removal: predictive ability of senior surgeons and residents.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jun;72(6):1062.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.01.023. Epub 2014 Feb 12. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24656427 Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;65(10):1977-83. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.030. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007. PMID: 17884525
-
Third molar removal: an overview of indications, imaging, evaluation, and assessment of risk.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Feb;19(1):1-13, v. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2006.11.007. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007. PMID: 18088860 Review.
-
Assessment of difficulty in third molar surgery--a systematic review.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):771-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.010. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19304033
Cited by
-
Radiographic Evaluation Factors That Influence the Decision of the Tooth Extraction Method.Cureus. 2024 Apr 6;16(4):e57746. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57746. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38586233 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the effects of antibiotic therapy and photobiomodulation with red and infrared lasers on the healing of postextraction sockets of third molars: A randomised controlled trial.Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Apr 17;40(1):196. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04445-4. Lasers Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40240714 Clinical Trial.
-
Classification of impacted mandibular third molars on cone-beam CT images.J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Apr 1;7(2):e224-31. doi: 10.4317/jced.51984. eCollection 2015 Apr. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015. PMID: 26155337 Free PMC article.
-
A deep learning model based on concatenation approach to predict the time to extract a mandibular third molar tooth.BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02614-3. BMC Oral Health. 2022. PMID: 36476146 Free PMC article.
-
Visualization of Inferior Alveolar and Lingual Nerve Pathology by 3D Double-Echo Steady-State MRI: Two Case Reports with Literature Review.J Imaging. 2022 Mar 17;8(3):75. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8030075. J Imaging. 2022. PMID: 35324630 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources