Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:5:44-50.
doi: 10.2174/1874306401105010044. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

Using spirometry to rule out restriction in patients with concomitant low forced vital capacity and obstructive pattern

Affiliations

Using spirometry to rule out restriction in patients with concomitant low forced vital capacity and obstructive pattern

Imran Khalid et al. Open Respir Med J. 2011.

Abstract

Background: Different formulas have been proposed to exclude restriction based on spirometry, however none of them have specifically tested the patients whose spirometry show both obstruction and a low forced vital capacity (FVC).

Study objective: The study was designed to create an algorithm that would better predict the absence of restriction in such patients.

Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

Methods: A cohort of consecutive adults that underwent complete pulmonary function testing from 2002-2004 was analyzed. The data was randomly split into two groups to allow for derivation and then validation of a predictive formula. Patients were randomly assigned into either a "derivation" or "validation" group. In the derivation group, stepwise logistic regression was used to determine a formula and optimal cut-off value for the variable with the best discriminative capacity. The formula was applied subsequently to the validation group to test the results and compared to previously published formula.

Results: The study group contained 766 patients. We determined that the variable with the highest association with TLC was [(FEV(1)/FVC) % predicted/FVC % predicted]. A value of ≥1.11 was found to be the maximal cutoff to predict the absence of restriction. The formula was applied to a validation group (n=397) and performed better than prior published algorithm with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 95%, 44%, 22%, and 98%, respectively.

Conclusion: Our formula performs superior to the previously published algorithms in patients with concomitant low FVC and obstruction to exclude restriction.

Keywords: Algorithm; restriction; spirometry; total lung capacity..

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Area under the curve based on our formula (AUC = 0.81).
Fig. (2)
Fig. (2)
Area under the curve based on Glady et al. formula (AUC = 0.71).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ryu JH, Scanlon PD. Obstructive lung diseases: COPD, Asthma, and many imitators. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:1144–53. - PubMed
    1. Glady CA, Aaron SD, Lunau M, Clinch J, Dales RE. A spirometry-based algorithm to direct lung function testing in the pulmonary function laboratory. Chest. 2003;123:1939–46. - PubMed
    1. Venkateshiah SB, Ioachimescu OC, McCarthy K, Stoller JK. The utility of spirometry in diagnosing pulmonary restriction. Lung. 2008;186:19–25. - PubMed
    1. Aaron SD, Dales RE, Cardinal P. How accurate is Spirometry at predicting restrictive pulmonary impairment? Chest. 1999;115:869–73. - PubMed
    1. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:948–68. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources