Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May;40(5):304-9.

[Gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas with a micropapillary pattern: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 21756823

[Gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas with a micropapillary pattern: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study]

[Article in Chinese]
Fang Liu et al. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2011 May.

Abstract

Objective: To study the clinicopathologic features and immunophenotype of gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas with a micropapillary pattern differentiation (GAMPD).

Methods: Seventy-three cases of GAMPD arising in gastrointestinal tract were retrospectively reviewed. Immunohistochemical study for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein-3 (IMP3) and E-cadherin was performed.

Results: Amongst the 73 cases studied, the micropapillary pattern accounted for 5% to 70% of the tumor component. It was often seen in a background of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. As compared with conventional adenocarcinoma, nodal metastasis was more frequently observed and the TNM tumor stage was statistically higher in GAMPD. The occurrence of micropapillary component in metastatic lymph nodes positively correlated with the proportion of micropapillary pattern in primary lesions. EMA staining on the stroma-facing surface of tumor micropapillae was demonstrated in 52.1% (38/73) of the cases. As compared with EMA-negative GAMPD, EMA-positive GAMPD was more in the stomach (P = 0.018), and with more metastatic lymph nodes (6.6 ± 5.8 vs 3.8 ± 4.7, P = 0.029). The rate of IMP3 expression in EMA-positive GAMPD was 86.8%(33/38), which was higher than that in conventional adenocarcinoma. In contrast, the rate of E-cadherin expression in GAMPD was lower than that in conventional adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions: GAMPD is a distinctive variant of gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas and different from conventional adenocarcinoma in tumor morphology, immunophenotype and biologic behavior. It carries an aggressive clinical course and poor prognostic outcome. Immunohistochemical study for EMA, IMP3 and E-cadherin would be helpful in the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of GAMPD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms