Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:5:96-104.
doi: 10.2174/1874210601105010096. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

Bone formation with two types of grafting materials: a histologic and histomorphometric study

Affiliations

Bone formation with two types of grafting materials: a histologic and histomorphometric study

Amir Reza Rokn et al. Open Dent J. 2011.

Abstract

Background: Although autogenous bone grafts are considered the gold standard for bone regeneration, they have certain limitations, including patient morbidity at the harvest site. Synthetic bone substitutes have been developed to overcome some of these limitations. The present study aimed to compare the osteogenic properties of Straumann Bone Ceramic (SBC), which is a biphasic calcium phosphate, with Bio-Oss, an inorganic bovine bone material, in an animal model.

Methods: Thirteen rabbits were included in this study. In each rabbit, four 6.5-mm-diameter identical defects were prepared on the calvarium. One site was filled with Bio-Oss, the second site was treated with small-particle SBC, the third site was treated with large-particle SBC, and the fourth site was left as an untreated control. After 4 and 8 weeks, the animals were sacrificed, and histologic and histomorphometric examinations were performed. The data were analyzed using Friedman and multiple-comparison Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the amount of bone fill between the four groups. L-SBC showed more inflammation and foreign-body reactions than the other bone substitutes.

Conclusion: No statistically significant differences were found between groups. Further studies on this issue seem necessary.

Keywords: Bone transplantation; animal study.; bone ceramics; inorganic bovine bone mineral.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1).
Fig. (1).
(a) Four identical defects were prepared in the rabbit calvarium. (b) Three defects were filled with bone xenograft or alloplast materials and one was left unfilled to serve as a control. (c) Bone formation in control sample at 20× magnification (black arrow = regenerated bone). (d) Bio-Oss sample at 20× magnification (black arrow = regenerated bone; blue arrow = remaining grafting material). (e) Small-particle bone ceramic sample at 20× magnification (black arrow = regenerated bone; blue arrow = remaining grafting material). (f) Large-particle bone ceramic sample at 20× magnification (black arrow = regenerated bone; blue arrow = remaining grafting material).

References

    1. Kauschke E, Rumpel E, Fanghanel J, Bayerlein T, Gedrange T, Proff P. The in vitro viability and growth of fibroblasts cultured in the presence of different bone grafting materials (nanobone and straumann bone Ceramic) Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2006;65:37–42. - PubMed
    1. Bucholz RW. Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitute. Clin Orthop Res. 2002;395:44–52. - PubMed
    1. Lynch SE, Genco RJ, Marx RE. Tissue engineering: applications in maxillofacial surgery and periodontics. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence. 1999
    1. Habibovic P, Kruyt MC, Juhl MV, et al. Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite-based bone graft substitutes. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1363–70. - PubMed
    1. Fellah BH, Gauthier O, Weiss P, Chappard D, Layrolle P. Osteogenicity of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics and bone autograft in a goat model. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1177–88. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources