Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;118(9):1701-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

First eye prediction error improves second eye refractive outcome results in 2129 patients after bilateral sequential cataract surgery

Affiliations

First eye prediction error improves second eye refractive outcome results in 2129 patients after bilateral sequential cataract surgery

Petros Aristodemou et al. Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To define theoretical correction factors for second-eye intraocular lens (IOL) power adjustment based on first eye refractive prediction error (PE).

Design: Database study.

Participants: We included 2129 patients who underwent bilateral sequential phacoemulsification cataract surgery with the same IOL model.

Methods: Retrospectively calculated PEs (Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T) were analyzed for association between paired eyes, examining the effect of interocular differences in axial length (AL) and corneal power. A range of correction factors (CF) derived from the first eye PE were applied to the second eye PE using optimized and non-optimized IOL constants (IOLCs).

Main outcome measures: Second eye mean absolute error (MAE).

Results: Prediction errors of paired eyes were correlated. Interocular corneal power differences exceeding 0.60 diopters (D) were associated with a weaker correlation but interocular AL differences did not affect the correlation. When a 50% CF was applied to second eyes of patients with a first eye PE between ±0.50 and ±1.50 D, it improved refractive outcomes from 30%, 56%, and 92% to 42%, 75%, and 96% within ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D, respectively, and reduced the MAE from 0.49 to 0.37 D (P<0.0001). For first eye PE below ±0.50 D, a 50% CF reduced the MAE from 0.32 to 0.30 D (P<0.00001). A 50% CF also reduces second eye MAE for eyes with nonoptimized IOLCs.

Conclusions: A 50% CF reduces second eye PE when either first eye optimized PE is within ±1.50 D or when nonoptimized IOLCs are used. The correlation is weaker when interocular corneal power differences are >0.60 D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Improving cataract surgery refractive outcomes.
    Ladas JG, Stark WJ. Ladas JG, et al. Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1699-700. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.038. Ophthalmology. 2011. PMID: 21889661 No abstract available.
  • IOL Power prediction.
    Arshinoff SA. Arshinoff SA. Ophthalmology. 2012 Dec;119(12):2646; author reply 2646-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.055. Ophthalmology. 2012. PMID: 23207024 No abstract available.