Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Sep 1;174(5):591-603.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr140. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers

Ross L Prentice et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

The food frequency questionnaire approach to dietary assessment is ubiquitous in nutritional epidemiology research. Food records and recalls provide approaches that may also be adaptable for use in large epidemiologic cohorts, if warranted by better measurement properties. The authors collected (2007-2009) a 4-day food record, three 24-hour dietary recalls, and a food frequency questionnaire from 450 postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative prospective cohort study (enrollment, 1994-1998), along with biomarkers of energy and protein consumption. Through comparison with biomarkers, the food record is shown to provide a stronger estimate of energy and protein than does the food frequency questionnaire, with 24-hour recalls mostly intermediate. Differences were smaller and nonsignificant for protein density. Food frequencies, records, and recalls were, respectively, able to "explain" 3.8%, 7.8%, and 2.8% of biomarker variation for energy; 8.4%, 22.6%, and 16.2% of biomarker variation for protein; and 6.5%, 11.0%, and 7.0% of biomarker variation for protein density. However, calibration equations that include body mass index, age, and ethnicity substantially improve these numbers to 41.7%, 44.7%, and 42.1% for energy; 20.3%, 32.7%, and 28.4% for protein; and 8.7%, 14.4%, and 10.4% for protein density. Calibration equations using any of the assessment procedures may yield suitable consumption estimates for epidemiologic study purposes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000611.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Women’s Health Initiative Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment Study (NPAAS; 2007–2009) procedures. DLW, doubly labeled water; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Scatterplot of the Women’s Health Initiative Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment Study (NPAAS; 2007–2009) primary versus reliability sample. Each plot provides the Pearson correlation for the log-measure. DLW, doubly labeled water; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; UN, urinary nitrogen; 4DFR, 4-day food record.

References

    1. Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003. p. 88. (WHO technical report 916)
    1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research; 1997. p. 371. - PubMed
    1. Schatzkin A, Subar AF, Moore S, et al. Observational epidemiologic studies of nutrition and cancer: the next generation (with better observation) Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(4):1026–1032. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bingham SA, Luben R, Welch A, et al. Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer? Lancet. 2003;362(9379):212–214. - PubMed
    1. Freedman LS, Potischman N, Kipnis V, et al. A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat-breast cancer relationship. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(4):1011–1021. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data