Saying what's on your mind: working memory effects on sentence production
- PMID: 21767058
- PMCID: PMC3199029
- DOI: 10.1037/a0024350
Saying what's on your mind: working memory effects on sentence production
Abstract
The role of working memory (WM) in sentence comprehension has received considerable interest, but little work has investigated how sentence production relies on memory mechanisms. Three experiments investigated speakers' tendency to produce syntactic structures that allow for early production of material that is accessible in memory. In Experiment 1, speakers produced accessible information early less often when under a verbal WM load than when under no load. Experiment 2 found the same pattern for given-new ordering (i.e., when accessibility was manipulated by making information given). Experiment 3 addressed the possibility that these effects do not reflect WM mechanisms but rather increased task difficulty by relying on the distinction between verbal and spatial WM: Speakers' tendency to produce sentences respecting given-new ordering was reduced more by a verbal than by a spatial WM load. These patterns show that accessibility effects do in fact reflect accessibility in verbal WM and that representations in sentence production are vulnerable to interference from other information in memory.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Children's verbal working memory: role of processing complexity in predicting spoken sentence comprehension.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):669-82. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0111). Epub 2012 Jan 5. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012. PMID: 22223892
-
Planning sentences while doing other things at the same time: effects of concurrent verbal and visuospatial working memory load.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Apr;70(4):811-831. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1167926. Epub 2016 Apr 12. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017. PMID: 26985697
-
Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information.Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):50-68. doi: 10.1037/a0014411. Psychol Bull. 2009. PMID: 19210053 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Verbal short-term memory capacities and executive function in semantic and syntactic interference resolution during sentence comprehension: Evidence from aphasia.Neuropsychologia. 2018 May;113:111-125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 7. Neuropsychologia. 2018. PMID: 29524507
-
The role of variation in phonological and semantic working memory capacities in sentence comprehension: neural evidence from healthy and brain-damaged individuals.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Feb;25(1):240-262. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01217-5. Epub 2024 Sep 13. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 39271594 Review.
Cited by
-
Syntactic flexibility and planning scope: the effect of verb bias on advance planning during sentence recall.Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 20;5:1174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01174. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25368592 Free PMC article.
-
A Cross-Linguistic Study of Individual Differences in Speech Planning.Front Psychol. 2021 May 7;12:655516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655516. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34025520 Free PMC article.
-
Robust Effects of Working Memory Demand during Naturalistic Language Comprehension in Language-Selective Cortex.J Neurosci. 2022 Sep 28;42(39):7412-7430. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1894-21.2022. J Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36002263 Free PMC article.
-
The dynamics of variation in individuals.Linguist Var. 2016 Jan;16(2):300-336. doi: 10.1075/lv.16.2.06tam. Epub 2017 Jan 12. Linguist Var. 2016. PMID: 31897370 Free PMC article.
-
A Closer Look at Phonology as a Predictor of Spoken Sentence Processing and Word Reading.J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Aug;44(4):399-415. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9292-8. J Psycholinguist Res. 2015. PMID: 24627225
References
-
- Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 2. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
-
- Ariel M. The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics. 1991;16:443–463.
-
- Arnold JE. How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass. 2010;4:187–203.
-
- Arnold JE, Wasow T, Losongco A, Ginstrom R. Heavyness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language. 2000;76:28–55.