Reducing the risk of surgical site infections: did we really think SCIP was going to lead us to the promised land?
- PMID: 21767147
- DOI: 10.1089/sur.2011.036
Reducing the risk of surgical site infections: did we really think SCIP was going to lead us to the promised land?
Abstract
Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with substantial patient morbidity and death. It is estimated that 750,000-1 million SSIs occur in the U.S. each year, utilizing 3.7 million extra hospital days and costing more than $1.6 billion in excess hospital charges.
Method: Review of pertinent English-language literature.
Results: The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) was embraced as a "one-size-fits-all" strategy to reduce postoperative infectious morbidity 25% by 2010. Unfortunately, the evidence suggests that SCIP by itself has had little efficacy in reducing the overall risk of SSI. Whereas the SCIP initiative represents a first national effort to focus on reducing postoperative infectious morbidity and deaths, it fails to consider salient risk factors such as body mass index and selected surgical practices, including tourniquet application prior to incision.
Conclusion: Rather than focus on a single risk-reduction strategy, future efforts to improve surgical outcomes should embrace a "SCIP-plus" multi-faceted, tiered interventional strategy that includes pre-admission antiseptic showering, state-of-the-art skin antisepsis, innovative antimicrobial technology, active staphylococcal surveillance, and pharmacologic-physiologic considerations unique to selective patient populations.
Comment in
-
SCIP to the Loo?Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Jun;12(3):161-2. doi: 10.1089/sur.2011.9915. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011. PMID: 21812656 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
