Preliminary results after reconstruction of bony defects of the proximal humerus with an allograft-resurfacing composite
- PMID: 21768636
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B8.26011
Preliminary results after reconstruction of bony defects of the proximal humerus with an allograft-resurfacing composite
Abstract
We retrospectively studied 14 patients with proximal and diaphyseal tumours and disappearing bone (Gorham's) disease of the humerus treated with wide resection and reconstruction using an allograft-resurfacing composite (ARC). There were ten women and four men, with a mean age of 35 years (8 to 69). At a mean follow-up of 25 months (10 to 89), two patients had a fracture of the allograft. In one of these it was revised with a similar ARC and in the other with an intercalary prosthesis. A further patient had an infection and a fracture of the allograft that was revised with a megaprosthesis. In all patients with an ARC, healing of the ARC-host bone interface was observed. One patient had failure of the locking mechanism of the total elbow replacement. The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score for the upper extremity was 77% (46.7% to 86.7%), which represents good and excellent results; one patient had a poor result (46.7%). In the short term ARC effectively relieves pain and restores shoulder function in patients with wide resection of the proximal humerus. Fracture and infection remain significant complications.
Similar articles
-
Do Early Results of Proximal Humeral Allograft-Prosthetic Composite Reconstructions Persist at 5-year Followup?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Apr;477(4):758-765. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000354. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 30811366 Free PMC article.
-
Complications and functional outcomes of reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft after intra-articular resection of the proximal aspect of the humerus.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Aug;81(8):1138-46. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199908000-00009. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999. PMID: 10466646
-
Revision arthroplasty with use of a reverse shoulder prosthesis-allograft composite.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):119-27. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00094. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009. PMID: 19122086
-
[Functional outcome following shoulder tumor resection and reconstruction].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jun 15;44(12):809-12. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006. PMID: 16889725 Chinese.
-
Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):e54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00378. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014. PMID: 24695931
Cited by
-
Outcome after reconstruction of the proximal humerus for tumor resection: a systematic review.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2245-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3474-4. Epub 2014 Jan 28. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. PMID: 24469551 Free PMC article.
-
Functional outcome and quality of life following resection of the proximal humerus performed for musculoskeletal tumors and reconstruction done by four different methods.Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Sep;107(3):351-359. doi: 10.1007/s12306-022-00771-w. Epub 2023 Jan 17. Musculoskelet Surg. 2023. PMID: 36648636 Free PMC article.
-
Megaprosthesis Versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for the Management of Massive Skeletal Defects: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Jun;14(3):255-270. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09707-6. Epub 2021 Apr 17. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021. PMID: 33864628 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Allograft reconstruction for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors of the upper extremity.Sarcoma. 2013;2013:925413. doi: 10.1155/2013/925413. Epub 2013 Feb 14. Sarcoma. 2013. PMID: 23476115 Free PMC article.
-
What is the Optimal Reconstruction Option after the Resection of Proximal Humeral Tumors? A Systematic Review.Open Orthop J. 2017 Mar 22;11:203-211. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711010203. eCollection 2017. Open Orthop J. 2017. PMID: 28458733 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical