Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May 10;75(4):68.
doi: 10.5688/ajpe75468.

Active-learning processes used in US pharmacy education

Affiliations

Active-learning processes used in US pharmacy education

David W Stewart et al. Am J Pharm Educ. .

Abstract

Objective: To document the type and extent of active-learning techniques used in US colleges and schools of pharmacy as well as factors associated with use of these techniques.

Methods: A survey instrument was developed to assess whether and to what extent active learning was used by faculty members of US colleges and schools of pharmacy. This survey instrument was distributed via the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) mailing list.

Results: Ninety-five percent (114) of all US colleges and schools of pharmacy were represented with at least 1 survey among the 1179 responses received. Eighty-seven percent of respondents used active-learning techniques in their classroom activities. The heavier the teaching workload the more active-learning strategies were used. Other factors correlated with higher use of active-learning strategies included younger faculty member age (inverse relationship), lower faculty member rank (inverse relationship), and departments that focused on practice, clinical and social, behavioral, and/or administrative sciences.

Conclusions: Active learning has been embraced by pharmacy educators and is used to some extent by the majority of US colleges and schools of pharmacy. Future research should focus on how active-learning methods can be used most effectively within pharmacy education, how it can gain even broader acceptance throughout the academy, and how the effect of active learning on programmatic outcomes can be better documented.

Keywords: active learning; pharmacy education; survey; teaching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percent of Time Engaged in Active-Learning Strategies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blouin R, Riffee W, Robinson E, et al. AACP curricular change summit supplement: roles of innovation in education delivery. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(8):Article 154. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knapp D, Knapp D. Attributes of colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(5):Article 96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oblinger D Boomers. gen-Xers and millenials: understanding the new students. EDUCAUSE Rev. 2003;38(4):37–47.
    1. Jungnickel P, Kelley K, Hammer D, Haines S, Marlowe K. Addressing competencies for the future in the professional classroom. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(8):Article 156. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cisneros R, Salisbury-Glennon J, Anderson-Harper H. Status of problem-based learning research in pharmacy education: a call for future research. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(1):19–26.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources