Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;32(4):431-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11239-011-0614-5.

Implementation and evaluation of a pharmacy-led thromboprophylaxis campaign in a community hospital

Affiliations

Implementation and evaluation of a pharmacy-led thromboprophylaxis campaign in a community hospital

Marie-Christine Bernier et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

In hospitalized patients, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Despite evidence demonstrating efficacy and safety of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in the prevention of VTE, its use remains low. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of use of thromboprophylaxis before and after a pharmacy-led thrombosis prevention campaign in medical patients hospitalized in a community hospital. A pharmacy-led multifaceted thromboprophylaxis campaign including continuing education activities for physicians and pharmacists and individualized academic detailing activities supported by clinical tools were implemented over an 8-week period. In a quasi-experimental study, the incidence of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was evaluated using a retrospective chart review and compared before and after the campaign in medical patients at high and non-high risk of VTE as defined by the American College of Chest Physicians criteria. The medical charts of 461 patients were reviewed; 66 and 58 patients were at high-risk of VTE prior to and after the campaign, respectively. After the campaign, thromboprophylaxis ordering in high-risk patients increased from 15.2 to 43.1% (adjusted OR: 6.8; 95% CI: 2.5-18.0). Thromboprophylaxis ordering in non-high risk patients was 1.8% before the campaign and 6.0% after. This increase was not statistically significant (adjusted OR: 4.6; 95% CI: 1.0-20.4). The incidence of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients at high-risk of VTE increased significantly after the campaign but remained sub-optimal. Longer or a different campaign may be needed to ensure long-term optimal thromboprophylaxis use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 1996 May 18;347(9012):1357-61 - PubMed
    1. J Manag Care Pharm. 2005 Nov-Dec;11(9):755-62 - PubMed
    1. Thromb Res. 2007;119(2):145-55 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacotherapy. 2002 Dec;22(12):1564-78 - PubMed
    1. Am Heart J. 2003 Apr;145(4):614-21 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources