Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;42(6):1001-10.
doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1331-9.

Measuring reciprocity in high functioning children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders

Affiliations

Measuring reciprocity in high functioning children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders

Tineke Backer van Ommeren et al. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Few instruments have been developed that measure impairments in reciprocity, a defining feature of autism. We introduce a new test assessing the quality of reciprocal behaviour: the interactive drawing test (IDT). Children and adolescents (n = 49) with and without high functioning autism spectrum disorders (HFASD) were invited to collaborate with an experimenter in making a joint drawing. Within both groups the performance on collaborative reciprocity improved with age. However, compared to the control group, HFASD participants showed less collaborative and more basic reciprocal behaviour and preferred to draw their own objects. They were less tolerant of the experimenter's input as well. Performance on the IDT was independent of estimated verbal IQ. Reciprocal behaviour in self-initiated objects corresponded with more parental reported autistic traits, while reciprocal behaviour in other-initiated objects corresponded with less autistic traits. The findings of this study suggest that IDT is a promising instrument to assess reciprocity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proportion of collaborative engagement (The number of collaborative engagement contributions was calculated in relation to the total number of turns per child, resulting in proportion scores ranging from 0 to 1) based on participant or experimenter initiated elements of the drawing as a function of Group and Age
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example of a drawing by a HFASD participant (see “Appendix” for an explanation of the exchange)

References

    1. Aldridge MA, Stone KR, Sweeney MH, Bower TGR. Preverbal children with autism understand the intentions of others. Developmental Science. 2000;3:294–301. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00123. - DOI
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4. Washington D.C.: Author; 2000.
    1. Baron-Cohen S, Jolliffe T, Mortimore C, Robertson M. Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1997;38:813–822. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01599.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauminger N, Kasari C. Brief report: Theory of mind in high-functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 1999;29:81–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1025974701090. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauminger N, Shulman C, Agam G. Peer interaction and loneliness in high-functioning children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2003;33:489–507. doi: 10.1023/A:1025827427901. - DOI - PubMed