Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug 1;71(15):5062-6.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0277. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

Chemotherapeutic resistance: surviving stressful situations

Affiliations

Chemotherapeutic resistance: surviving stressful situations

Luke A Gilbert et al. Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Chemotherapeutic regimens involve the systemic administration of genotoxic compounds that induce cancer cell death via well-established DNA damage response signaling networks. Less understood is how the treatment of other cell types within the tumor microenvironment affects the therapeutic response. Here we discuss recent work that shows that tumor-adjacent cells can respond to genotoxic stress by activating a paracrine secretory program. Although this secretory response serves to protect progenitor cells and promote tissue regeneration in conditions of cellular stress, it can also be coopted by tumor cells to survive frontline chemotherapy. Thus, local prosurvival signaling may present a fundamental barrier to tumor clearance by genotoxic agents, suggesting that effective treatments need to target both cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A diagram showing microenvironment-specific responses to front-line chemotherapy. (Left) Systemic chemotherapy can effectively clear the majority of lymphoid tumor cells. (Right) However, genotoxic damage can also engage organ and cell-type specific stress responses. Paracrine pro-survival signaling in select tumor microenvironments can counter the efficacy of anti-cancer agents, leading to the persistence of minimal residual disease.

References

    1. Egeblad M, Nakasone ES, Werb Z. Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism. Developmental cell. 2010;18:884–901. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goss PE, Chambers AF. Does tumour dormancy offer a therapeutic target? Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:871–7. - PubMed
    1. Cave H, van der Werff ten Bosch J, Suciu S, Guidal C, Waterkeyn C, Otten J, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Childhood Leukemia Cooperative Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:591–8. - PubMed
    1. Brisco MJ, Condon J, Hughes E, Neoh SH, Sykes PJ, Seshadri R, et al. Outcome prediction in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by molecular quantification of residual disease at the end of induction. Lancet. 1994;343:196–200. - PubMed
    1. Aguirre-Ghiso JA. Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:834–46. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms