Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug 7;56(15):5045-62.
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/15/024. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

Dosimetric and geometric evaluation of a hybrid strategy of offline adaptive planning and online image guidance for prostate cancer radiotherapy

Han Liu  1 , Qiuwen Wu
Affiliations

Dosimetric and geometric evaluation of a hybrid strategy of offline adaptive planning and online image guidance for prostate cancer radiotherapy

Han Liu et al. Phys Med Biol. .

Abstract

For prostate cancer patients, online image-guided (IG) radiotherapy has been widely used in clinic to correct the translational inter-fractional motion at each treatment fraction. For uncertainties that cannot be corrected online, such as rotation and deformation of the target volume, margins are still required to be added to the clinical target volume (CTV) for the treatment planning. Offline adaptive radiotherapy has been implemented to optimize the treatment for each individual patient based on the measurements at early stages of treatment process. It has been shown that offline adaptive radiotherapy can effectively reduce the required margin. Recently a hybrid strategy of offline adaptive replanning and online IG was proposed and the geometric evaluation was performed. It was found that the planning margins can further be reduced by 1-2 mm compared to online IG only strategy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric benefits of such a hybrid strategy on the target and organs at risk. A total of 420 repeated helical computed tomography scans from 28 patients were included in the study. Both low-risk patients (LRP, CTV = prostate) and intermediate-risk patients (IRP, CTV = prostate + seminal vesicles, SV) were included in the simulation. Two registration methods, based on center-of-mass shift of prostate only and prostate plus SV, were performed for IRP. The intensity-modulated radiotherapy was used in the simulation. Criteria on both cumulative and fractional doses were evaluated. Furthermore, the geometric evaluation was extended to investigate the optimal number of fractions necessary to construct the internal target volume (ITV) for the hybrid strategy. The dosimetric margin improvement was smaller than its geometric counterpart and was in the range of 0-1 mm. The optimal number of fractions necessary for the ITV construction is 2 for LRPs and 3-4 for IRPs in a hypofractionation protocol. A new cumulative index of target volume was proposed for the evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy strategies, and it was found that it had the advantages over other indices in evaluating different adaptive radiotherapy strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simulation of online image guidance on one axial helical CT slice for an intermediate-risk patient. (a) before online correction. Yellow contour is the CTV0 in reference planning CT, Red contour is the treatment CTVi. (b) after online correction based on COM. Yellow contour is the reference CTV0, Blue is the treatment CTVi after Type A registration, and Red is the treatment CTV after Type B registration. Red and Blue contours are slightly different from the CTVi in (a) because the registration were in 3D.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Construction of ITV5 on an axial CT slice for intermediate-risk patient. Dark blue is the ITV5, which is the composite of CTV from first five fractions. Red, purple, skyblue, green are subsequent CTVi in treatment CTs after online correction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plan isodose distribution with zero ITV-to-PTV margin for one low-risk patient. Shaded areas are the 100% of prescription dose. Dark blue contour is the ITV5, Red contours are subsequent CTVi in treatment CTs after online correction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pass rate (in percent) as a function of required margin. (a) low-risk patients, (b) intermediate-risk patients with Type A registration, and (c) intermediate-risk patients with Type B registration.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Dose indices (gEUD) of critical organs for online IG and hybrid strategies. The gEUD values are expressed as a ratio of cumulative dose to plan dose at optimized margin for online IG. (a) bladder; (b) rectal wall.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The percentage of fractions that failed the criteria of 2% PTV dose reduction of CTV0 and ITV5 as a function of the margin for low-risk and intermediate-risk patients.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The average volumes and the margin added volumes of CTV0, ITVn (n=2,3,4,5) versus number of fractions to construct the ITVn. (a) Low-risk patients; (b) Intermediate-risk patients with Type A registration; (c) Intermediate-risk patients with Type B registration. The symbols on the left are for online IG and the rest for hybrid.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Cumulative index of target volume (CITV) for online IG and hybrid strategies. The symbols on the left are for online IG and the rest for hybrid.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adamson J, Wu Q. Prostate intrafraction motion assessed by simultaneous kV fluoroscopy at MV delivery II: adaptive strategies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78:1323–1330. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amer AM, Mackay RI, Roberts SA, Hendry JH, Williams PC. The required number of treatment imaging days for an effective off-line correction of systematic errors in conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer--a radiobiological analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2001;61:143–150. - PubMed
    1. Balter JM, Lam KL, Sandler HM, Littles JF, Bree RL, Ten Haken RK. Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:1281–1286. - PubMed
    1. Bel A, Vos PH, Rodrigus PT, Creutzberg CL, Visser AG, Stroom JC, Lebesque JV. High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;35:321–332. - PubMed
    1. Bortfeld T, van Herk M, Jiang S. When should systematic patient positioning errors in radiotherapy be corrected? Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:N297–N302. - PubMed

Publication types