Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;45(4):341-6.
doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.80322.

Distal forearm fractures in children: Cast index as predictor of re-manipulation

Affiliations

Distal forearm fractures in children: Cast index as predictor of re-manipulation

Ujjwal K Debnath et al. Indian J Orthop. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Displaced distal forearm fractures in children have been treated in above-elbow plaster casts since the last century. Cast index (CI) has been proposed as a measure to indicate how well the cast is molded to the contours of the forearm. In this study the CI in post-manipulation radiographs were analyzed to evaluate its relevance to re-angulation of distal forearm fractures in children in different age-groups.

Materials and methods: Out of 174 consecutive cases treated during the study period, 156 patients (114 male and 42 female) with a mean age of 9.8 years (range: 2-15 years) were included in this retrospective radiographic analysis; 18 patients were excluded for various reasons. All patients were manipulated in the operation theater under general anesthesia and a molded above-elbow cast was applied. The CI was measured on immediate post-manipulation radiographs. Children were divided into three groups according to age: group 1: <5 years, group 2: 5-10 years, and group 3: >10 years.

Results: Angulation of the fracture within the original plaster cast occurred in 30 patients (19.2%): 22/114 males and 8/42 females. The mean CI in these 30 patients who required a second procedure was 0.92±0.08, which was significantly more than the mean CI in the other children (0.77±0.07) (P<.001). The mean CI in children who underwent re-manipulation in the group 1 was 0.96, which was significantly higher than that of the other two groups, i.e., 0.90 in group 2 and 0.88 in group 3 (P<.05). A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve estimated the cutoff point for intraoperative CI of 0.84 when both the sensitivity and specificity of CI was high to predict re-manipulation for re-displaced fractures of the distal forearm in children in any age-group.

Conclusion: The CI is a valuable tool to assess the quality of molding of the cast following closed manipulation of forearm fractures in children. A high CI (≥0.84) in post-manipulation radiographs indicates increased risk of re-displacement of the fracture in children, especially in those under the age of 5 years and over the age of 10 years.

Keywords: Children; cast index; conservative treatment; forearm fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Pre-manipulation lateral view; (b) pre-manipulation AP view; (c) post-manipulation AP view, with moulded cast showing coronal plane dimension; (d) post-manipulation lateral view, with moulded cast showing sagittal plane dimension (CI = 0.67); (e) 3-weeks post-manipulation showing union in good alignment
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Initial AP radiograph in a poorly moulded plaster cast showing coronal plane dimension (CI = 0.96); (b) initial lateral radiograph in a poorly moulded plaster cast showing sagittal plane dimension; (c) post-manipulation AP radiograph in well-moulded cast showing coronal plane dimension (CI = 0.74); (d) post-manipulation lateral radiograph in well-moulded cast showing sagittal plane dimension; (e) lateral radiograph at 3 weeks showing maintenance of alignment
Graph 1
Graph 1
Box and plot showing mean CI in different age-groups in the non-re-manipulated children
Graph 2
Graph 2
Box and plot showing mean CI in different age-groups in the re-manipulated children
Graph 3
Graph 3
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve estimating the CI for the outcome variable, i.e., re-manipulation. At a CI of 0.84 the sensitivity is 85% and specificity is 81%. Area under the curve (AUC) is 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87 to 0.96; P<.001)

References

    1. Noonan KJ, Price CT. Forearm and distal radius fractures in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6:146–56. - PubMed
    1. Tachdijan MO. Paediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1972.
    1. Voto SJ, Weiner DS, Leighly B. Redisplacement after closed reduction after forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10:79–84. - PubMed
    1. Proctor MT, Moore DJ, Paterson JM. Redisplacement after manipulation of distal radial fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg B. 1993;75:453–4. - PubMed
    1. Bhatia M, Housden PH. Redisplacement of paediatric forearm fractures: Role of plaster moulding and padding. Injury. 2006;37:259–68. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources