Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:215964.
doi: 10.4061/2011/215964. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

Methods of Control of the Leishmania infantum Dog Reservoir: State of the Art

Affiliations

Methods of Control of the Leishmania infantum Dog Reservoir: State of the Art

Michele Podaliri Vulpiani et al. Vet Med Int. 2011.

Abstract

Leishmania infantum is a protozoan parasite causing severe vector-borne visceral diseases both in humans and dogs. The latter are the most important natural reservoir and therefore should be the main target of control measures. The real efficacy of seropositive dogs culling as a direct control method is still debated, and the new sensitivity of large part of population considers ethically unacceptable this kind of approach. Treatment of infectious dogs with one of the available therapeutic protocols is recommendable as it allows to reduce parasite burdens and therefore the possibility of transmission of Leishmania infantum to vectors. Vaccination has been proven to be a very effective control tool, but the absence of a commonly recognized diagnostic method able to distinguish vaccinate from seropositive individuals is still an important limit. Concerning indirect control methods, a number of studies have demonstrated the efficacy of topical insecticides treatment (collars, spot-on, and sprays) in reducing incidence and prevalence of L. infantum. Also, the reduction of the odds of seroconversion in humans in endemic areas has been reported after the application of indirect control measures on dogs. The contemporary use of direct and indirect methods is even more effective in reducing seroprevalence in dogs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evolution of prevalence and incidence of serological reactivity versus Leishmania infantum in two dog shelters during a 4-year period of contemporary use of direct (treatment with meglumine antimoniate and allopurinol) and indirect (spot-on repellent formulation imidacloprid 10%-permethrin 50%) control methods [9].

References

    1. Borja-Cabrera GP, Santos FN, Santos FB, et al. Immunotherapy with the saponin enriched-Leishmune® vaccine versus immunochemotherapy in dogs with natural canine visceral leishmaniasis. Vaccine. 2010;28(3):597–603. - PubMed
    1. Manzillo VF, Paparcone R, Cappiello S, De Santo R, Bianciardi P, Oliva G. Resolution of tongue lesions caused by Leishmania infantum in a dog treated with the association miltefosine-allopurinol. Parasites and Vectors. 2009;2(supplement 1, article S6) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gradoni L. An update on antileishmanial vaccine candidates and prospects for a canine Leishmania vaccine. Veterinary Parasitology. 2001;100(1-2):87–103. - PubMed
    1. Mauricio IL, Stothard JR, Miles MA. The strange case of Leishmania chagasi. Parasitology Today. 2000;16(5):188–189. - PubMed
    1. Quinnell RJ, Courtenay O. Transmission, reservoir hosts and control of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis. Parasitology. 2009;136(14):1915–1934. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources