Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:181093.
doi: 10.1155/2011/181093. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

Reconstruction of nasal skin cancer defects with local flaps

Affiliations

Reconstruction of nasal skin cancer defects with local flaps

A C Salgarelli et al. J Skin Cancer. 2011.

Abstract

Reconstruction of nasal defects must preserve the integrity of complex facial functions and expressions, as well as facial symmetry and a pleasing aesthetic outcome. The reconstructive modality of choice will depend largely on the location, size, and depth of the surgical defect. Individualized therapy is the best course, and numerous flaps have been designed to provide coverage of a variety of nasal-specific defects. We describe our experience in the aesthetic reconstruction of nasal skin defects following oncological surgery. The use of different local flaps for nasal skin cancer defects is reported in 286 patients. Complications in this series were one partial flap dehiscence that healed by secondary intention, two forehead flaps, and one bilobed flap with minimal rim necrosis that resulted in an irregular scar requiring revision. Aesthetic results were deemed satisfactory by all patients and the operating surgeons. The color and texture matches were aesthetically good, and the nasal contour was distinct in all patients. All scars were inconspicuous and symmetrical. No patient had tenting or a flat nose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) BCC involving the lateral tip of the nose. (b) Zitelli's flap design. (c) Tumour resection. (d) Intraoperative view: double transposition flap. (e) Nasal appearance two years after surgery.
Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) BCC involving nasal tip: flap design. (b) Tumour resection. (c) Intraoperative view: modified bilateral nasalis flap. (d) Interpositional flap from the alar groove. (e) Nasal appearance before and one year after surgery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Nasolabial flap design. (b) Tumour resection. (c) The flap is transferred to the recipient site. (d) Nasal appearance two years after surgery.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Multifocal nasal skin cancer: flap design. (b)Skin defect after tumour resection. (c) Nasal appearance one year after surgery: frontal view. (d) Nasal appearance one year after surgery: lateral view.

References

    1. Netscher DT, Spira M. Basal cell carcinoma: an overview of tumor biology and treatment. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2004;113(5):74E–94E.
    1. Ge NN, McGuire JF, Dyson S, Chark D. Nonmelanoma skin cancer of the head and neck II: surgical treatment and reconstruction. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 2009;30(3):181–192. - PubMed
    1. Boyd AS, Shyr Y, King LE. Basal cell carcinoma in young women: an evaluation of the association of tanning bed use and smoking. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2002;46(5):706–709. - PubMed
    1. Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1992;27(2 I):241–248. - PubMed
    1. Wolf DJ, Zitelli JA. Surgical margins for basal cell carcinoma. Archives of Dermatology. 1987;123(3):340–344. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources