Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb;37(1):242-52.
doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9442-y.

State disparities in time trends of adolescent body mass index percentile and weight-related behaviors in the United States

Daniel R Taber  1 , June Stevens, Charles Poole, Matthew L Maciejewski, Kelly R Evenson, Dianne S Ward
Affiliations

State disparities in time trends of adolescent body mass index percentile and weight-related behaviors in the United States

Daniel R Taber et al. J Community Health. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Evidence is conflicting as to whether youth obesity prevalence has reached a plateau in the United States overall. Trends vary by state, and experts recommend exploring whether trends in weight-related behaviors are associated with changes in weight status trends. Thus, our objective was to estimate between-state variation in time trends of adolescent body mass index (BMI) percentile and weight-related behaviors from 2001 to 2007. A time series design combined cross-sectional Youth Risk Behavior Survey data from 272,044 adolescents in 29 states from 2001 to 2007. Self-reported height, weight, sports participation, physical education, television viewing, and daily consumption of 100% fruit juice, milk, and fruits and vegetables were collected. Linear mixed models estimated state variance in time trends of behaviors and BMI percentile. Across states, BMI percentile trends were consistent despite differences in behavioral trends. Boys experienced a modest linear increase in BMI percentile (ß = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.30); girls experienced a non-linear increase, as the rate of increase declined over time from 1.02 units in 2001-2002 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.36) to 0.23 units in 2006-2007 (95% CI: -0.09, 0.56). States in which BMI percentile decreased experienced a greater decrease in TV viewing than states where BMI percentile increased. Otherwise, states with disparate BMI percentile trends did not differ with respect to behaviors. Future research should explore the role of other behaviors (e.g., soda consumption), measurement units (e.g., portion size), and societal trends (e.g., urban sprawl) on state and national adiposity trends.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
State-specific trends in weight-related behaviors among adolescent girls in the United States, state Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 2001–2007 (All variables coded as continuous outcomes)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
State-specific trends in BMI percentile among adolescent girls and boys, state Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 2001–2007
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Must A, Strauss RS. Risks and consequences of childhood and adolescent obesity. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders. 1999;23(Suppl 2):S2–S11. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organization technical report series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. - PubMed
    1. Bibbins-Domingo K, Coxson P, Pletcher MJ, Lightwood J, Goldman L. Adolescent overweight and future adult coronary heart disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;357(23):2371–2379. - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288(14):1728–1732. - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):242–249. - PubMed

Publication types