Experience with a patient-friendly, mandatory, single-blastocyst transfer policy: the power of one
- PMID: 21774925
- PMCID: PMC4120282
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.043
Experience with a patient-friendly, mandatory, single-blastocyst transfer policy: the power of one
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether a mandatory single-blastocyst transfer (mSBT) algorithm reduced multiple gestation rates without sacrificing clinical pregnancy rates.
Design: Retrospective review.
Setting: U.S. university-based assisted reproductive technology (ART) program.
Patient(s): All women younger than 38 years undergoing their first ART cycle from 2009 to 2010 with ≥4 high-grade embryos on day 3 after oocyte retrieval (patients from 2009 were the "before" group, and patients completing ART under the mSBT policy in 2010 were the "after" group).
Intervention(s): mSBT algorithm.
Main outcome measure(s): Multiple gestation and clinical pregnancy rates.
Result(s): Of the qualified patients, 136 women met inclusion criteria (62 from 2009, 74 from 2010). The baseline demographics were similar between the groups. Statistically significantly fewer blastocysts were transferred per patient in 2010 compared with 2009 (1.5 vs. 1.9). The clinical pregnancy rates before (67.7%) or after (63.5%) the mSBT policy were not statistically significantly different. Multiple gestation rates were statistically significantly reduced, from 43.8% (2009) to 14.6% (2010) after the mSBT policy was instituted. More patients from 2010 had ≥1 blastocyst cryopreserved compared with 2009 (52.9% vs. 30.6%).
Conclusion(s): A novel single-blastocyst transfer algorithm reduced multiple gestation rates and improved cryopreservation rates without compromising clinical pregnancy rates in good-prognosis patients.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2008 Assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2010.
-
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) [Accessed January 10, 2011];ART fact sheet. Available at: http://www.eshre.eu/ESHRE/English/Guidelines-Legal/ART-fact-sheet/page.a....
-
- Pinborg A. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:575–93. - PubMed
-
- Schieve LA, Peterson HB, Meikle SF, Jeng G, Danel I, Burnett NM, et al. Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization. JAMA. 1999;282:1832–8. - PubMed
-
- Gelbaya TA, Tsoumpou I, Nardo LG. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:936–45. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
