Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;96(3):580-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

Experience with a patient-friendly, mandatory, single-blastocyst transfer policy: the power of one

Affiliations

Experience with a patient-friendly, mandatory, single-blastocyst transfer policy: the power of one

John M Csokmay et al. Fertil Steril. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a mandatory single-blastocyst transfer (mSBT) algorithm reduced multiple gestation rates without sacrificing clinical pregnancy rates.

Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: U.S. university-based assisted reproductive technology (ART) program.

Patient(s): All women younger than 38 years undergoing their first ART cycle from 2009 to 2010 with ≥4 high-grade embryos on day 3 after oocyte retrieval (patients from 2009 were the "before" group, and patients completing ART under the mSBT policy in 2010 were the "after" group).

Intervention(s): mSBT algorithm.

Main outcome measure(s): Multiple gestation and clinical pregnancy rates.

Result(s): Of the qualified patients, 136 women met inclusion criteria (62 from 2009, 74 from 2010). The baseline demographics were similar between the groups. Statistically significantly fewer blastocysts were transferred per patient in 2010 compared with 2009 (1.5 vs. 1.9). The clinical pregnancy rates before (67.7%) or after (63.5%) the mSBT policy were not statistically significantly different. Multiple gestation rates were statistically significantly reduced, from 43.8% (2009) to 14.6% (2010) after the mSBT policy was instituted. More patients from 2010 had ≥1 blastocyst cryopreserved compared with 2009 (52.9% vs. 30.6%).

Conclusion(s): A novel single-blastocyst transfer algorithm reduced multiple gestation rates and improved cryopreservation rates without compromising clinical pregnancy rates in good-prognosis patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Summary of the mandatory single-blastocyst transfer (mSBT) algorithm from study inclusion to embryo transfer. Patients <38 years old and undergoing their first assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle were included in the analysis (Box 1). On day 3 after oocyte retrieval (Box 2), patients with at least four high-grade embryos were encouraged to proceed to a day-5 blastocyst transfer. If the patient agreed to the mSBT policy, the embryos were placed in extended culture. If the patient declined the mSBT policy, two cleavage-stage embryos were transferred on day 3. On day 5 after oocyte retrieval (Box 3), patients who agreed to the mSBT had a transfer of a single high-grade blastocyst. If the blastocyst was less than “BB” grade, the patient was given the option to transfer one or two blastocysts. Csokmay. Single-blastocyst transfer algorithm. Fertil Steril 2011.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Summary of the percentage of blastocysts transferred per patient (y axis) over time per quarter year (Q1–4) from 2009 to 2010 (x axis). Transfers of a single blastocyst (red line) increased after the institution of the mandatory single-blastocyst transfer (mSBT) policy as marked with an arrow in January 2010. Conversely, the percentage of two blastocyst transfers (blue line) decreased after the mSBT policy. No patient had more than two blastocysts transferred, so the total percentage of embryos transferred each quarter equals 100%. (B) Percentage of patients accepting or declining a single-blastocyst transfer (x axis) in 2010 (quarters 1–4, y axis) as designated by their agreement or declination of the mandatory single-blastocyst (mSBT) policy. More patients agreed (red bars) to the mSBT as 2010 progressed and fewer patients declined (blue bars). Csokmay. Single-blastocyst transfer algorithm. Fertil Steril 2011.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2008 Assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2010.
    1. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) [Accessed January 10, 2011];ART fact sheet. Available at: http://www.eshre.eu/ESHRE/English/Guidelines-Legal/ART-fact-sheet/page.a....
    1. Pinborg A. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:575–93. - PubMed
    1. Schieve LA, Peterson HB, Meikle SF, Jeng G, Danel I, Burnett NM, et al. Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization. JAMA. 1999;282:1832–8. - PubMed
    1. Gelbaya TA, Tsoumpou I, Nardo LG. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:936–45. - PubMed