Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;8(6):2366-85.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph8062366. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

A framework for integrating environmental justice in regulatory analysis

Affiliations

A framework for integrating environmental justice in regulatory analysis

Onyemaechi C Nweke. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

With increased interest in integrating environmental justice into the process for developing environmental regulations in the United States, analysts and decision makers are confronted with the question of what methods and data can be used to assess disproportionate environmental health impacts. However, as a first step to identifying data and methods, it is important that analysts understand what information on equity impacts is needed for decision making. Such knowledge originates from clearly stated equity objectives and the reflection of those objectives throughout the analytical activities that characterize Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA), a process that is traditionally used to inform decision making. The framework proposed in this paper advocates structuring analyses to explicitly provide pre-defined output on equity impacts. Specifically, the proposed framework emphasizes: (a) defining equity objectives for the proposed regulatory action at the onset of the regulatory process, (b) identifying specific and related sub-objectives for key analytical steps in the RIA process, and (c) developing explicit analytical/research questions to assure that stated sub-objectives and objectives are met. In proposing this framework, it is envisioned that information on equity impacts informs decision-making in regulatory development, and that this is achieved through a systematic and consistent approach that assures linkages between stated equity objectives, regulatory analyses, selection of policy options, and the design of compliance and enforcement activities.

Keywords: disproportionate impacts; environmental justice; equity; inequality; inequity; regulatory development; regulatory impact analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
OECD Framework for Regulatory Impact Analysis. Source: Building an Institutional Framework for Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA): Guidance for Policy Makers [10].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proposed Framework for Assuring the Integration of EJ in Regulatory Impact Analysis.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Relationship between Overarching Objectives, Sub-objectives and Research and Analytical Questions in Proposed Framework.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jackson LP. Seven Priorities for EPA's Future. Memorandum from EPA Administrator to EPA Employees. Available online: http://blog.epa.gov/administrator/2010/01/12/seven-priorities-for-epas-f... (accessed on 12 January 2011).
    1. USEPA. 2006–2011 EPA Strategic Plan. US Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC, USA: 2006.
    1. US EPA. EPA's Action Development Process: Interim Guidance on Considering Environmental Justice During the Development of an Action. US Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC, USA: 2010.
    1. GAO. Environmental Justice: EPA Should Devote More Attention to Environmental Justice when Developing Clean Air Rules. Government Accounting Office; Washington, DC, USA: 2005. GAO_05-289.
    1. US EPA. Evaluation Report: EPA Needs to Conduct Environmental Justice Reviews of Its Programs, Policies, and Activities. US Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC, USA: 2006. 2006-P-00034.

MeSH terms