A framework for integrating environmental justice in regulatory analysis
- PMID: 21776235
- PMCID: PMC3138030
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8062366
A framework for integrating environmental justice in regulatory analysis
Abstract
With increased interest in integrating environmental justice into the process for developing environmental regulations in the United States, analysts and decision makers are confronted with the question of what methods and data can be used to assess disproportionate environmental health impacts. However, as a first step to identifying data and methods, it is important that analysts understand what information on equity impacts is needed for decision making. Such knowledge originates from clearly stated equity objectives and the reflection of those objectives throughout the analytical activities that characterize Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA), a process that is traditionally used to inform decision making. The framework proposed in this paper advocates structuring analyses to explicitly provide pre-defined output on equity impacts. Specifically, the proposed framework emphasizes: (a) defining equity objectives for the proposed regulatory action at the onset of the regulatory process, (b) identifying specific and related sub-objectives for key analytical steps in the RIA process, and (c) developing explicit analytical/research questions to assure that stated sub-objectives and objectives are met. In proposing this framework, it is envisioned that information on equity impacts informs decision-making in regulatory development, and that this is achieved through a systematic and consistent approach that assures linkages between stated equity objectives, regulatory analyses, selection of policy options, and the design of compliance and enforcement activities.
Keywords: disproportionate impacts; environmental justice; equity; inequality; inequity; regulatory development; regulatory impact analysis.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Symposium on integrating the science of environmental justice into decision-making at the Environmental Protection Agency: an overview.Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19-26. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300368. Epub 2011 Oct 25. Am J Public Health. 2011. PMID: 22028456 Free PMC article.
-
Using health impact assessment to integrate environmental justice into federal environmental regulatory analysis.New Solut. 2013;23(3):439-66. New Solut. 2013. PMID: 24551949
-
Using health impact assessment to integrate environmental justice into federal environmental regulatory analysis.New Solut. 2013 Jan 1;23(3):1-28. doi: 10.2190/NS.23.3.b. New Solut. 2013. PMID: 23945351
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
-
Accounting for Health Risk Inequality in Regulatory Impact Analysis: Barriers and Opportunities.Risk Anal. 2021 Apr;41(4):610-618. doi: 10.1111/risa.13714. Epub 2021 Feb 13. Risk Anal. 2021. PMID: 33580582 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Place-based estimates of cigarette butt litter raise environmental justice concerns in the United States.PLoS One. 2024 Aug 15;19(8):e0308930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308930. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39146265 Free PMC article.
-
Symposium on integrating the science of environmental justice into decision-making at the Environmental Protection Agency: an overview.Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19-26. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300368. Epub 2011 Oct 25. Am J Public Health. 2011. PMID: 22028456 Free PMC article.
-
Using photovoice as a tool for community engagement to assess the environment and explore environmental health disparities.J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2017 Fall;10(3):68-86. J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2017. PMID: 37151751 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jackson LP. Seven Priorities for EPA's Future. Memorandum from EPA Administrator to EPA Employees. Available online: http://blog.epa.gov/administrator/2010/01/12/seven-priorities-for-epas-f... (accessed on 12 January 2011).
-
- USEPA. 2006–2011 EPA Strategic Plan. US Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC, USA: 2006.
-
- US EPA. EPA's Action Development Process: Interim Guidance on Considering Environmental Justice During the Development of an Action. US Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC, USA: 2010.
-
- GAO. Environmental Justice: EPA Should Devote More Attention to Environmental Justice when Developing Clean Air Rules. Government Accounting Office; Washington, DC, USA: 2005. GAO_05-289.
-
- US EPA. Evaluation Report: EPA Needs to Conduct Environmental Justice Reviews of Its Programs, Policies, and Activities. US Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, DC, USA: 2006. 2006-P-00034.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous