Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:589674.
doi: 10.1155/2011/589674. Epub 2011 May 15.

Dietary exposure to pesticide residues from commodities alleged to contain the highest contamination levels

Affiliations

Dietary exposure to pesticide residues from commodities alleged to contain the highest contamination levels

Carl K Winter et al. J Toxicol. 2011.

Abstract

Probabilistic techniques were used to characterize dietary exposure of consumers to pesticides found in twelve commodities implicated as having the greatest potential for pesticide residue contamination by a United States-based environmental advocacy group. Estimates of exposures were derived for the ten most frequently detected pesticide residues on each of the twelve commodities based upon residue findings from the United States Department of Agriculture's Pesticide Data Program. All pesticide exposure estimates were well below established chronic reference doses (RfDs). Only one of the 120 exposure estimates exceeded 1% of the RfD (methamidophos on bell peppers at 2% of the RfD), and only seven exposure estimates (5.8 percent) exceeded 0.1% of the RfD. Three quarters of the pesticide/commodity combinations demonstrated exposure estimates below 0.01% of the RfD (corresponding to exposures one million times below chronic No Observable Adverse Effect Levels from animal toxicology studies), and 40.8% had exposure estimates below 0.001% of the RfD. It is concluded that (1) exposures to the most commonly detected pesticides on the twelve commodities pose negligible risks to consumers, (2) substitution of organic forms of the twelve commodities for conventional forms does not result in any appreciable reduction of consumer risks, and (3) the methodology used by the environmental advocacy group to rank commodities with respect to pesticide risks lacks scientific credibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Environmental Working Group. EWG's Shoppers Guide to PesticidesTM . Environmental Working Group, Washington, DC, USA, 2010, http://www.foodnews.org.
    1. Environmental Working Group. EWG's Shoppers Guide Helps Cut Consumer Pesticide Exposure. Environmental Working Group, Washington, DC, USA, June 2010, http://www.foodnews.org/press.php.
    1. USDA. Pesticide Data Program Progress Report 2008–2010. Washington, DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Program; 2010. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELDEV3002094.
    1. FDA. FDA Monitoring Program FY 2008. United States Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, USA, October 2010, http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/FoodContaminantsAdulteration/Pesticid....
    1. Katz JM, Winter CK. Comparison of pesticide exposure from consumption of domestic and imported fruits and vegetables. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2009;47(2):335–338. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources