Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Sep 1;11(3):251-7.
doi: 10.2165/11592830-000000000-00000.

Seated cuff blood pressure-lowering efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Seated cuff blood pressure-lowering efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Dean J Kereiakes et al. Drugs R D. .

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a common co-morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and well tolerated, effective therapies are needed to achieve guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) goals in these patients.

Objective: The aim of this study was to present the results of a prespecified analysis of key secondary endpoints from a 12-week, open-label, single-arm study evaluating the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

Study design and methods: After a placebo run-in period, 192 patients received olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg/day for 3 weeks. If BP remained ≥ 120/70 mmHg, patients were uptitrated at 3-week intervals to olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/day, olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg/day, and olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ 40/25 mg/day.

Main outcome measure: Endpoints evaluated in this analysis were the change from baseline in mean seated cuff BP (SeBP), proportions of patients achieving SeBP goals, and distribution of SeBP reductions.

Results: Mean SeBP was 158.1/90.0 mmHg at baseline. The mean ± standard error of BP reductions at 12 weeks for systolic and diastolic BP were 21.3 ± 1.1 mmHg and 9.8 ± 0.6 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001 for each). At the end of the study, the proportion of patients with diabetes achieving the recommended SeBP goal of <130/80 mmHg was 41.1%.

Conclusions: An olmesartan medoxomil ± HCTZ treatment regimen significantly reduced BP from baseline in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00403481.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Table I
Table I
Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and baseline blood pressure (BP) informationa,b
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Change from baseline in seated cuff blood pressure (SeBP) at week 12/last observation carried forward for the total cohort, patients with stage 1 hypertension, and patients with stage 2 hypertension. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean. p < 0.0001 for all reductions vs baseline. HCTZ = hydrochlorothiazide; OM = olmesartan medoxomil; SeDBP = seated cuff diastolic blood pressure; SeSBP = seated cuff systolic blood pressure; *p < 0.0001, **p < 0.001, *** p < 0.01, **** p-value not significant vs preceding treatment regimen.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative seated cuff blood pressure (SeBP) goal achievement at week 12/last observation carried forward. The SeBP measurements are calculated using the total number of subjects in the treatment cohort (n = 192) with the last observation carried forward for patients who did not have a measurement at end of study. HCTZ = hydrochlorothiazide; OM = olmesartan medoxomil.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The proportion of patients achieving prespecified systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreases at week 12. Percentages are calculated using the total number of subjects in the treatment efficacy cohort as the denominator. HCTZ = hydrochlorothiazide; OM = olmesartan medoxomil.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wong ND, Lopez VA, L’Italien G, et al. Inadequate control of hypertension in US adults with cardiovascular disease comorbidities in 2003–2004. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(22):2431–6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.22.2431. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360(9349):1903–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11911-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arauz-Pacheco C, Parrott MA, Raskin P. Hypertension management in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl.1):65–7. - PubMed
    1. Adler AI, Stratton IM, Neil HA, et al. Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321(7258):412–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.412. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes — 2009. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl.1):13–61. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S013. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data