Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun 3:2:116.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00116. eCollection 2011.

Flexibility in embodied language understanding

Affiliations

Flexibility in embodied language understanding

Roel M Willems et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Do people use sensori-motor cortices to understand language? Here we review neurocognitive studies of language comprehension in healthy adults and evaluate their possible contributions to theories of language in the brain. We start by sketching the minimal predictions that an embodied theory of language understanding makes for empirical research, and then survey studies that have been offered as evidence for embodied semantic representations. We explore four debated issues: first, does activation of sensori-motor cortices during action language understanding imply that action semantics relies on mirror neurons? Second, what is the evidence that activity in sensori-motor cortices plays a functional role in understanding language? Third, to what extent do responses in perceptual and motor areas depend on the linguistic and extra-linguistic context? And finally, can embodied theories accommodate language about abstract concepts? Based on the available evidence, we conclude that sensori-motor cortices are activated during a variety of language comprehension tasks, for both concrete and abstract language. Yet, this activity depends on the context in which perception and action words are encountered. Although modality-specific cortical activity is not a sine qua non of language processing even for language about perception and action, sensori-motor regions of the brain appear to make functional contributions to the construction of meaning, and should therefore be incorporated into models of the neurocognitive architecture of language.

Keywords: EEG; embodied; fMRI; language; neuroimaging; semantics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aglioti S. M., Cesari P., Romani M., Urgesi C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1109–1116 - PubMed
    1. Aguirre G. K., Zarahn E., D'Esposito M. (1998). An area within human ventral cortex sensitive to “building” stimuli: evidence and implications. Neuron 21, 373–383 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80546-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allport D. A. (1985). “Distributed memory, modular systems and dysphasia,” in Current Perspectives in Dysphasia, eds Newman S. K., Epstein R. (Edinburgh: Livingstone; ), 30–60
    1. Anderson M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: a field guide. Artif. Intell. 149, 91–130
    1. Anderson M. L. (2008). “On the grounds of (X)-grounded cognition,” in The Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach, eds Calvo P., Gomila T. (Amsterdam: Elsevier; ), 423–435

LinkOut - more resources