Surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women: safety, effectiveness and cost-utility of trans-obturator tape (TOT) versus tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) five years after a randomized surgical trial
- PMID: 21781314
- PMCID: PMC3171308
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-34
Surgical management of stress urinary incontinence in women: safety, effectiveness and cost-utility of trans-obturator tape (TOT) versus tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) five years after a randomized surgical trial
Abstract
Background: We recently completed a randomized clinical trial of two minimally invasive surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence, the retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) versus the trans-obturator tape (TOT) procedure. At one year postoperatively, we were concerned to find that a significant number of women had tape that was palpable when a vaginal examination was undertaken. Because the risk factors for adverse outcomes of tape surgery are not clearly understood, we are unable to say whether palpable tapes will lead to vaginal erosions or whether they merge into vaginal tissue. We do not know whether patients go on to have further adverse consequences of surgery, leading to additional cost to patients and healthcare system. Our current study is a 5 year follow-up of the women who took part in our original trial.
Methods/design: All 199 women who participated in our original trial will be contacted and invited to take part in the follow-up study. Consenting women will attend a clinic visit where they will have a physical examination to identify vaginal erosion or other serious adverse outcomes of surgery, undertake a standardized pad test for urinary incontinence, and complete several health-related quality of life questionnaires (15D, UDI-6, IIQ-7). Analyses will compare the outcomes for women in the TOT versus TVT groups. The cost-effectiveness of TOT versus TVT over the 5 years after surgery, will be assessed with the use of disease-specific health service administrative data and an objective health outcome measure. A cost-utility analysis may also be undertaken, based on economic modeling, data from the clinical trial and inputs obtained from published literature.
Discussion: This study is needed now, because TOT and TVT are among the most frequently conducted surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence in Canada. Because stress urinary incontinence is so common, the impact of selecting an approach that causes more adverse events, or is less effective, will have a significant impact on individual quality of life, and societal and health care costs.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00234754. Registered October 2005.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence-trans-obturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape-5-year follow up: an economic evaluation.BJOG. 2017 Aug;124(9):1431-1439. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14227. Epub 2016 Aug 10. BJOG. 2017. PMID: 27506185 Clinical Trial.
-
Transobturator tape versus retropubic tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year safety and effectiveness outcomes following a randomised trial.Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):879-86. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2902-7. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. PMID: 26670575 Clinical Trial.
-
[Clinical study on tension-free vaginal tape and tension-free vaginal tape obturator for surgical treatment of severe stress urinary incontinence].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Mar;43(3):180-4. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008. PMID: 18788565 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
The efficacy and safety comparison of surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence: A network meta-analysis.Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Apr;37(4):1199-1211. doi: 10.1002/nau.23468. Epub 2018 Jan 13. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018. PMID: 29331033 Review.
-
Minimally invasive techniques for female stress urinary incontinence, how, why, when.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Nov;288(5):995-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3024-4. Epub 2013 Sep 20. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013. PMID: 24052223 Review.
Cited by
-
Babcock versus Scissor Tensioning for Retropubic Mid-Urethral Slings: Comparing Two Intra-Operative Techniques Through 5 Years of Follow-Up.Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Feb;36(2):279-287. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05916-y. Epub 2024 Oct 1. Int Urogynecol J. 2025. PMID: 39352429 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Urethral Mesh Assessment in Cancer Patients.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 27;15(23):5599. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235599. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38067303 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A head-to-head comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values in a general population sample.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Feb 19;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02096-z. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023. PMID: 36803866 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison Between the Transobturator Tape Procedure and Anterior Colporrhaphy With the Kelly's Plication in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Clinical Trial.Nephrourol Mon. 2015 Sep 16;7(5):e32046. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.32046. eCollection 2015 Sep. Nephrourol Mon. 2015. PMID: 26543834 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of urinary incontinence treatments measured using the 15D Health-Related Quality of Life instrument.Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):359-67. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2206-8. Epub 2013 Sep 6. Int Urogynecol J. 2014. PMID: 24008366
References
-
- Health Canada Marketed Health Products Directorate. Complications associated with transvaginal implantation of surgical mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (4 February 2010) http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/alt_formats/pdf/medeff/advisories-avis/pr... (accessed 6 July 2011)
-
- FDA Public Health Notification. Serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence (October 20, 2008) http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNo... (accessed 6 July 2011) - PubMed
-
- Minassian V, Drutz H, Al-Badr A. Urinary incontinence as a worldwide problem. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;82:327–338. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical