Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;130(3):377-82.
doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance

Affiliations

From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance

Jane Kaye. Hum Genet. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

The future holds the possibility to link and network biobanks, existing biorepositories and reference databases for research purposes in ways that have not been possible before. There is the potential to develop 'research portals' that will enable researchers to access these research resources that are located around the globe with the click of a mouse. In this paper, I will argue that our current governance system for research is unable to provide all of the oversight and accountability mechanisms that are required for this new way of doing research that is based upon flows of data across international borders. For example, our current governance framework for research is nationally based, with a complex system of laws, policies and practice that can be unique to a jurisdiction. It is also evident that many of the nationally based governance bodies in this field do not have the legal powers or expertise to adjudicate on the complex issues, such as privacy and disclosure risks that are raised by cross-border data sharing. In addition, the conceptual underpinning of this research governance structure is based on the "one researcher, one project, one jurisdiction" model. In the conclusion of this paper, I lay out some preliminary ideas as to how this system has to change to accommodate research that is based on networks. I suggest that a move to digital governance mechanisms might be a start to making research governance systems more appropriate for the 21st century.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Better Regulation Task Force (2007) Principles of good regulation (revised). Available at http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/brc/publications/principlesentry.html
    1. Black J. Critical reflections on regulation. Australian J Leg Philos. 2000;21:1–35.
    1. Bramhall P et al (2011) Technical Architecture arising from second Case Study D2.2, Version 1.0 (link)
    1. Cambon-Thomsen A, Thorisson GA, Mabile L, BRIF workshop group (2011) The role of a bioresource research impact factor as an incentive to share human bioresources. Nat Genet 43:503–504 - PubMed
    1. Caulfield T, Kaye J. Broad consent in biobanking: reflections on seemingly insurmountable dilemmas. Med Law Int. 2009;10(2):85–101.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources