From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance
- PMID: 21785980
- PMCID: PMC3155683
- DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0
From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance
Abstract
The future holds the possibility to link and network biobanks, existing biorepositories and reference databases for research purposes in ways that have not been possible before. There is the potential to develop 'research portals' that will enable researchers to access these research resources that are located around the globe with the click of a mouse. In this paper, I will argue that our current governance system for research is unable to provide all of the oversight and accountability mechanisms that are required for this new way of doing research that is based upon flows of data across international borders. For example, our current governance framework for research is nationally based, with a complex system of laws, policies and practice that can be unique to a jurisdiction. It is also evident that many of the nationally based governance bodies in this field do not have the legal powers or expertise to adjudicate on the complex issues, such as privacy and disclosure risks that are raised by cross-border data sharing. In addition, the conceptual underpinning of this research governance structure is based on the "one researcher, one project, one jurisdiction" model. In the conclusion of this paper, I lay out some preliminary ideas as to how this system has to change to accommodate research that is based on networks. I suggest that a move to digital governance mechanisms might be a start to making research governance systems more appropriate for the 21st century.
References
- 
    - Better Regulation Task Force (2007) Principles of good regulation (revised). Available at http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/brc/publications/principlesentry.html
 
- 
    - Black J. Critical reflections on regulation. Australian J Leg Philos. 2000;21:1–35.
 
- 
    - Bramhall P et al (2011) Technical Architecture arising from second Case Study D2.2, Version 1.0 (link)
 
- 
    - Cambon-Thomsen A, Thorisson GA, Mabile L, BRIF workshop group (2011) The role of a bioresource research impact factor as an incentive to share human bioresources. Nat Genet 43:503–504 - PubMed
 
- 
    - Caulfield T, Kaye J. Broad consent in biobanking: reflections on seemingly insurmountable dilemmas. Med Law Int. 2009;10(2):85–101.
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
 
        