Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;130(1):EL32-7.
doi: 10.1121/1.3599022.

Temporal integration of loudness measured using categorical loudness scaling and matching procedures

Affiliations

Temporal integration of loudness measured using categorical loudness scaling and matching procedures

Daniel L Valente et al. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Temporal integration of loudness of 1 kHz tones with 5 and 200 ms durations was assessed in four subjects using two loudness measurement procedures: categorical loudness scaling (CLS) and loudness matching. CLS provides a reliable and efficient procedure for collecting data on the temporal integration of loudness and previously reported nonmonotonic behavior observed at mid-sound pressure level levels is replicated with this procedure. Stimuli that are assigned to the same category are effectively matched in loudness, allowing the measurement of temporal integration with CLS without curve-fitting, interpolation, or assumptions concerning the form of the loudness growth function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean temporal integration as a function of level for four individual subjects (1–4) estimated from CLS and loudness matching. The best polynomial fit to the data is shown for each individual track within a panel. The fit order was determined by visual inspection with the least order, which represented the data. The threshold for the 5 ms tone is also shown for all four subjects.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(Color online) Measured temporal integration as a function of level for the current study as well as for previous studies which used the same stimulus parameters.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Salim, S. C., Kopun, J. G., Neely, S. T., Jesteadt, W., Stiegemann, B., and Gorga, M. P. (2010). “Reliability of categorical loudness scaling and its relation to threshold,” Ear Hear. 31, 567–578. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anweiler, A. K., and Verhey, J. L. (2006). “Spectral loudness summation for short and long signals as a function of level,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2919–2928. - PubMed
    1. Buus, S., Florentine, M., and Poulsen, T. (1999). “Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 3464–3480. - PubMed
    1. Epstein, M., and Florentine, M. (2005). “Matching test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 907–913. - PubMed
    1. Epstein, M. (2007). “An introduction to induced loudness reduction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, EL74–EL80. - PubMed

Publication types