Temporal integration of loudness measured using categorical loudness scaling and matching procedures
- PMID: 21786865
- PMCID: PMC3138798
- DOI: 10.1121/1.3599022
Temporal integration of loudness measured using categorical loudness scaling and matching procedures
Abstract
Temporal integration of loudness of 1 kHz tones with 5 and 200 ms durations was assessed in four subjects using two loudness measurement procedures: categorical loudness scaling (CLS) and loudness matching. CLS provides a reliable and efficient procedure for collecting data on the temporal integration of loudness and previously reported nonmonotonic behavior observed at mid-sound pressure level levels is replicated with this procedure. Stimuli that are assigned to the same category are effectively matched in loudness, allowing the measurement of temporal integration with CLS without curve-fitting, interpolation, or assumptions concerning the form of the loudness growth function.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America
Figures


Similar articles
-
Reliability of categorical loudness scaling and its relation to threshold.Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):567-78. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181da4d15. Ear Hear. 2010. PMID: 20588122 Free PMC article.
-
A test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions.J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):907-13. doi: 10.1121/1.1954547. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005. PMID: 16158646
-
The acoustic reflex threshold: not predictive for loudness perception in normally-hearing listeners.Audiology. 1999 Nov-Dec;38(6):303-7. doi: 10.3109/00206099909073040. Audiology. 1999. PMID: 10582530
-
Optimized loudness-function estimation for categorical loudness scaling data.Hear Res. 2014 Oct;316:16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 21. Hear Res. 2014. PMID: 25058812
-
Estimates of loudness, loudness discomfort, and the auditory dynamic range: normative estimates, comparison of procedures, and test-retest reliability.J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Feb;16(2):85-100. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16.2.4. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005. PMID: 15807048 Review.
Cited by
-
Deriving loudness growth functions from categorical loudness scaling data.J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Dec;142(6):3660. doi: 10.1121/1.5017618. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017. PMID: 29289103 Free PMC article.
-
Relations among Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Response Measures, Categorical Loudness Judgments, and Their Associated Physical Intensities.Semin Hear. 2017 Feb;38(1):94-114. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598067. Semin Hear. 2017. PMID: 28286366 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Anweiler, A. K., and Verhey, J. L. (2006). “Spectral loudness summation for short and long signals as a function of level,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2919–2928. - PubMed
-
- Buus, S., Florentine, M., and Poulsen, T. (1999). “Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 3464–3480. - PubMed
-
- Epstein, M., and Florentine, M. (2005). “Matching test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 907–913. - PubMed
-
- Epstein, M. (2007). “An introduction to induced loudness reduction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, EL74–EL80. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources