Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;140(4):674-692.
doi: 10.1037/a0024695.

Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span

Gregory C Burgess  1 , Jeremy R Gray  2 , Andrew R A Conway  3 , Todd S Braver  1
Affiliations

Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span

Gregory C Burgess et al. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Fluid intelligence (gF) and working memory (WM) span predict success in demanding cognitive situations. Recent studies show that much of the variance in gF and WM span is shared, suggesting common neural mechanisms. This study provides a direct investigation of the degree to which shared variance in gF and WM span can be explained by neural mechanisms of interference control. The authors measured performance and functional magnetic resonance imaging activity in 102 participants during the n-back WM task, focusing on the selective activation effects associated with high-interference lure trials. Brain activity on these trials was correlated with gF, WM span, and task performance in core brain regions linked to WM and executive control, including bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (middle frontal gyrus; BA9) and parietal cortex (inferior parietal cortex; BA 40/7). Interference-related performance and interference-related activity accounted for a significant proportion of the shared variance in gF and WM span. Path analyses indicate that interference control activity may affect gF through a common set of processes that also influence WM span. These results suggest that individual differences in interference-control mechanisms are important for understanding the relationship between gF and WM span.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Venn diagrams illustrating variance-partitioning method used to divide variance in gF, WM span, and interference control measures into common and shared portions. Figure 1a illustrates the general method conceptually. Figure 1b shows the variance portions related to lure accuracy. Figure 1c shows the variance portions related to lure activity factor scores. N.B., size of the overlapping circles is not drawn in proportion to the amount of variance explained by those portions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Brain regions in which lure-related activity correlates with gF, WM span, and lure accuracy. Color of regions reflects z-statistic for correlation between lure-related activity and WM span. Scatterplots demonstrate the correlations of the lure activity factor scores with gF, WM span, and lure accuracy respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Path model predicting gF with indirect paths from lure activity and lure accuracy through WM span
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ackerman PL. Individual differences in skill learning: an integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin. 1987;102:3–27.
    1. Ackerman PL, Beier ME, Boyle MO. Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2002;131:567–589. - PubMed
    1. Badre D, D’Esposito M. Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a hierarchical organization of the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2007;19:2082–2099. - PubMed
    1. Badre D, Wagner AD. Frontal lobe mechanisms that resolve proactive interference. Cerebral Cortex. 2005;15:2003–2012. - PubMed
    1. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.

Publication types