Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic predictive markers of irinotecan activity and toxicity
- PMID: 21787264
- DOI: 10.2174/138920011798062283
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic predictive markers of irinotecan activity and toxicity
Abstract
After the rapid development of new classes of antineoplastic drugs, research activities have focused their efforts to the identification of predictive markers of drug activity and tolerability. Irinotecan (CPT-11) may induce severe toxicities (diarrhea, neutropenia) that limit its clinical use, but the increasing knowledge of its pharmacokinetics offered a potential approach to treatment optimization. Pharmacokinetics, the first area of investigation, has identified markers such as biliary index, the relative extent of conversion and the glucuronidation ratio, which are capable to define the risk for severe adverse effects. Because of the existence of some issues concerning the adoption of pharmacokinetic strategies to optimize CPT-11 dose and schedule, analyses of genetic polymorphisms seemed to offer a more reliable and safer approach for the identification of patients at risk than pharmacokinetics. In this view, the uridine diphosphate glucuronosil transferase isoform 1A1 (UGT1A1) was associated with significant changes in disposition of CPT-11 and its metabolites, and consequently with treatment-induced toxicities. However, the complex pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and the involvement of several enzymes other than UGT (i.e., carboxyl estherases, CYP450 isoforms), and transmembrane transporters (ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCG2, SLCO1B1) make difficult the identification of patients with an optimal sensitivity and specificity, and a large part of variability among patients still remains unexplained. Furthermore, prospective clinical studies that should demonstrate the reliability of those pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic markers are still lacking. In the present review, pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic markers will be discussed.
Similar articles
-
Comprehensive pharmacogenetic analysis of irinotecan neutropenia and pharmacokinetics.J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 1;27(16):2604-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6300. Epub 2009 Apr 6. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19349540 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacogenetics of irinotecan disposition and toxicity: a review.Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Aug;5(3):209-17. doi: 10.2174/157488410791498806. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2010. PMID: 20406168 Review.
-
ABCB1, SLCO1B1 and UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms are associated with toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line irinotecan.Drug Metab Lett. 2007 Jan;1(1):23-30. doi: 10.2174/187231207779814328. Drug Metab Lett. 2007. PMID: 19356014 Clinical Trial.
-
Increased frequency of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 7/7 in patients experiencing severe irinotecan-induced toxicities.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2007 Jul;6(8):583-7. doi: 10.3816/CCC.2007.n.026. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2007. PMID: 17681105
-
Pharmacogenetics and irinotecan therapy.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Nov 15;63(22):2211-7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp060155. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006. PMID: 17090741 Review.
Cited by
-
The Co-Delivery of Natural Products and Small RNAs for Cancer Therapy: A Review.Molecules. 2025 Mar 27;30(7):1495. doi: 10.3390/molecules30071495. Molecules. 2025. PMID: 40286130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical significance of UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms on irinotecan-based regimens as the treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.Onco Targets Ther. 2014 Sep 23;7:1653-61. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S67867. eCollection 2014. Onco Targets Ther. 2014. PMID: 25285015 Free PMC article.
-
UGT1A1 predicts outcome in colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and fluorouracil.World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 7;18(45):6635-44. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6635. World J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 23236239 Free PMC article.
-
Severe irinotecan-induced toxicity in a patient with UGT1A1 28 and UGT1A1 6 polymorphisms.World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 28;19(24):3899-903. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3899. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23840132 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the effect of genetic variation on the relationship between statins, cardiovascular disease and cancer.Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2013 Nov 28;4(4):183-92. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2013. PMID: 24319534 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical