Informing selection of nanomaterial concentrations for ToxCast in vitro testing based on occupational exposure potential
- PMID: 21788197
- PMCID: PMC3226507
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103750
Informing selection of nanomaterial concentrations for ToxCast in vitro testing based on occupational exposure potential
Abstract
Background: Little justification is generally provided for selection of in vitro assay testing concentrations for engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). Selection of concentration levels for hazard evaluation based on real-world exposure scenarios is desirable.
Objectives: Our goal was to use estimates of lung deposition after occupational exposure to nanomaterials to recommend in vitro testing concentrations for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast™ program. Here, we provide testing concentrations for carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles (NPs).
Methods: We reviewed published ENM concentrations measured in air in manufacturing and R&D (research and development) laboratories to identify input levels for estimating ENM mass retained in the human lung using the multiple-path particle dosimetry (MPPD) model. Model input parameters were individually varied to estimate alveolar mass retained for different particle sizes (5-1,000 nm), aerosol concentrations (0.1 and 1 mg/m3), aspect ratios (2, 4, 10, and 167), and exposure durations (24 hr and a working lifetime). The calculated lung surface concentrations were then converted to in vitro solution concentrations.
Results: Modeled alveolar mass retained after 24 hr is most affected by activity level and aerosol concentration. Alveolar retention for Ag and TiO2 NPs and CNTs for a working-lifetime (45 years) exposure duration is similar to high-end concentrations (~ 30-400 μg/mL) typical of in vitro testing reported in the literature.
Conclusions: Analyses performed are generally applicable for providing ENM testing concentrations for in vitro hazard screening studies, although further research is needed to improve the approach. Understanding the relationship between potential real-world exposures and in vitro test concentrations will facilitate interpretation of toxicological results.
Conflict of interest statement
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. EPA. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
Figures
Comment in
-
Nanotoxicology: in vitro-in vivo dosimetry.Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Jan;120(1):A13; author reply A13. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104320. Environ Health Perspect. 2012. PMID: 22214547 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Anjilvel S, Asgharian B. A multiple-path model of particle deposition in the rat lung. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1995;28(1):41–50. - PubMed
-
- Asgharian B, Hofman W, Bergmann R. Particle deposition in a multiple-path model of the human lung. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2001;34(4):332–339.
-
- Asgharian B, Price OT. Deposition of ultrafine (NANO) particles in the human lung. Inhal Toxicol. 2007;19:1045–1054. - PubMed
-
- Baron PA, Deye GJ, Chen BT, Schwegler-Berry DE, Shvedova AA, Castranova V. Aerosolization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for an inhalation study. Inhal Toxicol. 2008;20(8):751–760. - PubMed
-
- Bello D, Hart AJ, Ahn K, Hallock M, Yamamoto N, Garcia EJ, et al. Particle exposure levels during CVD growth and subsequent handling of vertically-aligned carbon nanotube films. Carbon. 2008;46(6):974–977.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical