Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;2(2):85-106.
doi: 10.1177/1758834009357188.

Systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Affiliations

Systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Ben Lawrence et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Systemic treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma achieves only modest benefits, with evidence indicating a survival advantage with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) over best supportive care alone, and further advantage of single-agent gemcitabine over 5-FU. There are very few regimens better than single-agent gemcitabine despite multiple trials of cytotoxic and targeted agents. The addition of a platinum agent has improved response rate but not survival. The addition of erlotinib has improved survival but only by a small margin. The use of gemcitabine in multidrug regimens containing one or more of: a platinum agent; fluoropyrimidine; anthracycline; and taxane has demonstrated advantages in response rate, progression-free survival and, in one randomized study, overall survival. After gemcitabine failure, second-line therapy with oxaliplatin and 5-FU provides a further survival advantage. Further advances depend upon the current and future clinical trials investigating enhanced delivery of current agents, new agents and novel modalities, improved supportive care, and treatment more tailored to the individual patient and tumour.

Keywords: adenocarcinoma; antineoplastic agents; chemotherapy; metastatic therapeutics; pancreas; pancreatic neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abou-Alfa G.K., Letourneau R., Harker G., Modiano M., Hurwitz H., Tchekmedyian N.S., et al. (2006) Randomized phase III study of exatecan and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in untreated advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 24: 4441–4447 - PubMed
    1. Alberts S.R., Townley P.M., Goldberg R.M., Cha S.S., Sargent D.J., Moore D.F., et al. (2003) Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II study. Ann Oncol 14: 580–585 - PubMed
    1. Alberts S.R., Schroeder M., Erlichman C., Steen P.D., Foster N.R., Moore D.F., Jr, et al. (2004) Gemcitabine and ISIS-2503 for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 22: 4944–4950 - PubMed
    1. Alberts S.R., Foster N.R., Morton R.F., Kugler J., Schaefer P., Wiesenfeld M., et al. (2005) PS-341 and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) randomized phase II study. Ann Oncol 16: 1654–1661 - PubMed
    1. Andre T., Noirclerc M., Hammel P., Meckenstock R., Landi B., Cattan S., et al. (2004) Phase II study of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (FOLFUGEM2). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28: 645–650 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources