Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Oct;22(10):1249-53.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1500-6. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

Double-blinded randomized trial of preoperative antibiotics in midurethral sling procedures and review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Double-blinded randomized trial of preoperative antibiotics in midurethral sling procedures and review of the literature

Oz Harmanli et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The objective of this study was to determine if prophylactic antibiotic use before midurethral sling procedures reduces infectious complications.

Methods: In this double-blinded randomized trial, we compared infectious complications between women who received cefazolin and placebo before midurethral sling procedures.

Results: The study was halted due to low rate of infectious outcomes seen at the first scheduled interim analysis. We enrolled 29 women in the cefazolin group and 30 in the placebo group. Total follow-up was 6 months (3-24 months). The groups were similar at the baseline. There was no statistically significant difference between the cefazolin and placebo groups, respectively, with respect to wound infections [1 (3.3%) and 0 (0%)], mesh exposure [0 (0%) and 1 (3.5%)], and bacteriuria [3 (10%) and 1 (3.5%)].

Conclusion: Because infection rates are low in both cefazolin and placebo groups, omitting preoperative antibiotics for midurethral slings may be justified.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 May;93(5 Pt 1):749-52 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1305-8 - PubMed
    1. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Oct;22(10):1255-65 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):611-21 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;99(4):629-34 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources