Changes in energy content of lunchtime purchases from fast food restaurants after introduction of calorie labelling: cross sectional customer surveys
- PMID: 21791497
- PMCID: PMC3144313
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4464
Changes in energy content of lunchtime purchases from fast food restaurants after introduction of calorie labelling: cross sectional customer surveys
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of fast food restaurants adding calorie labelling to menu items on the energy content of individual purchases.
Design: Cross sectional surveys in spring 2007 and spring 2009 (one year before and nine months after full implementation of regulation requiring chain restaurants' menus to contain details of the energy content of all menu items). Setting 168 randomly selected locations of the top 11 fast food chains in New York City during lunchtime hours.
Participants: 7309 adult customers interviewed in 2007 and 8489 in 2009.
Main outcome measures: Energy content of individual purchases, based on customers' register receipts and on calorie information provided for all items in menus.
Results: For the full sample, mean calories purchased did not change from before to after regulation (828 v 846 kcal, P = 0.22), though a modest decrease was shown in a regression model adjusted for restaurant chain, poverty level for the store location, sex of customers, type of purchase, and inflation adjusted cost (847 v 827 kcal, P = 0.01). Three major chains, which accounted for 42% of customers surveyed, showed significant reductions in mean energy per purchase (McDonald's 829 v 785 kcal, P = 0.02; Au Bon Pain 555 v 475 kcal, P<0.001; KFC 927 v 868 kcal, P<0.01), while mean energy content increased for one chain (Subway 749 v 882 kcal, P<0.001). In the 2009 survey, 15% (1288/8489) of customers reported using the calorie information, and these customers purchased 106 fewer kilocalories than customers who did not see or use the calorie information (757 v 863 kcal, P<0.001).
Conclusion: Although no overall decline in calories purchased was observed for the full sample, several major chains saw significant reductions. After regulation, one in six lunchtime customers used the calorie information provided, and these customers made lower calorie choices.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at
Comment in
-
Calorie labelling on the high street.BMJ. 2011 Jul 26;343:d4502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4502. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21791499 No abstract available.
-
A parallel with patient choice.BMJ. 2011 Aug 23;343:d5367. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5367. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21862547 No abstract available.
-
Serious methodological flaws compromise study findings.BMJ. 2011 Sep 13;343:d5797; author reply 5800. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5797. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21914749 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A Natural Experiment to Evaluate the Nutritional Content of Restaurant Meal Purchases After Calorie Labeling.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Dec;120(12):2039-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Aug 29. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020. PMID: 32868189 Free PMC article.
-
Sociodemographic disparities among fast-food restaurant customers who notice and use calorie menu labels.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Jul;115(7):1093-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Feb 3. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015. PMID: 25659920
-
Consumer awareness of fast-food calorie information in New York City after implementation of a menu labeling regulation.Am J Public Health. 2010 Dec;100(12):2520-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.191908. Epub 2010 Oct 21. Am J Public Health. 2010. PMID: 20966367 Free PMC article.
-
Sodium menu labelling: priorities for research and policy.Public Health Nutr. 2021 Apr;24(6):1542-1551. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020003961. Epub 2020 Oct 9. Public Health Nutr. 2021. PMID: 33032669 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Restaurant Menu Labeling Policy: Review of Evidence and Controversies.Curr Obes Rep. 2016 Mar;5(1):72-80. doi: 10.1007/s13679-016-0193-z. Curr Obes Rep. 2016. PMID: 26877095 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Does nutrition information on menus impact food choice? Comparisons across two hospital cafeterias.Public Health Nutr. 2014 Jun;17(6):1393-402. doi: 10.1017/S136898001300164X. Epub 2013 Jul 5. Public Health Nutr. 2014. PMID: 23830036 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the impact of calorie labeling on McDonald's restaurant menus: a natural experiment.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 4;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0865-7. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019. PMID: 31684961 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Propensity Score Methods in a Quasi-Experimental Study of the Impact of Menu-Labeling.PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0144962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144962. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26677849 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Energy contribution of sugar-sweetened beverage refills at fast-food restaurants.Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2349-2354. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000611. Epub 2017 May 9. Public Health Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28485266 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of restaurant menu calorie labeling.Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):e11-24. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302570. Epub 2015 Mar 19. Am J Public Health. 2015. PMID: 25790388 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA 2010: published online 13 January. - PubMed
-
- Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. High body mass index for age among US children and adolescents, 2003-2006. JAMA 2008;299:2401-5. - PubMed
-
- Silver LD, MT Bassett. Food safety for the 21st century. JAMA 2008;300:957-9. - PubMed
-
- Harris JL, Pomeranz JL, Lobstein T, Brownell KD. A crisis in the marketplace: how food marketing contributes to childhood obesity and what can be done. Ann Rev Public Health 2009;30:211-25. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical