Changes in energy content of lunchtime purchases from fast food restaurants after introduction of calorie labelling: cross sectional customer surveys
- PMID: 21791497
- PMCID: PMC3144313
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4464
Changes in energy content of lunchtime purchases from fast food restaurants after introduction of calorie labelling: cross sectional customer surveys
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of fast food restaurants adding calorie labelling to menu items on the energy content of individual purchases.
Design: Cross sectional surveys in spring 2007 and spring 2009 (one year before and nine months after full implementation of regulation requiring chain restaurants' menus to contain details of the energy content of all menu items). Setting 168 randomly selected locations of the top 11 fast food chains in New York City during lunchtime hours.
Participants: 7309 adult customers interviewed in 2007 and 8489 in 2009.
Main outcome measures: Energy content of individual purchases, based on customers' register receipts and on calorie information provided for all items in menus.
Results: For the full sample, mean calories purchased did not change from before to after regulation (828 v 846 kcal, P = 0.22), though a modest decrease was shown in a regression model adjusted for restaurant chain, poverty level for the store location, sex of customers, type of purchase, and inflation adjusted cost (847 v 827 kcal, P = 0.01). Three major chains, which accounted for 42% of customers surveyed, showed significant reductions in mean energy per purchase (McDonald's 829 v 785 kcal, P = 0.02; Au Bon Pain 555 v 475 kcal, P<0.001; KFC 927 v 868 kcal, P<0.01), while mean energy content increased for one chain (Subway 749 v 882 kcal, P<0.001). In the 2009 survey, 15% (1288/8489) of customers reported using the calorie information, and these customers purchased 106 fewer kilocalories than customers who did not see or use the calorie information (757 v 863 kcal, P<0.001).
Conclusion: Although no overall decline in calories purchased was observed for the full sample, several major chains saw significant reductions. After regulation, one in six lunchtime customers used the calorie information provided, and these customers made lower calorie choices.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at
Comment in
-
Calorie labelling on the high street.BMJ. 2011 Jul 26;343:d4502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4502. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21791499 No abstract available.
-
A parallel with patient choice.BMJ. 2011 Aug 23;343:d5367. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5367. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21862547 No abstract available.
-
Serious methodological flaws compromise study findings.BMJ. 2011 Sep 13;343:d5797; author reply 5800. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5797. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21914749 No abstract available.
References
-
- Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA 2010: published online 13 January. - PubMed
-
- Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Flegal KM. High body mass index for age among US children and adolescents, 2003-2006. JAMA 2008;299:2401-5. - PubMed
-
- Silver LD, MT Bassett. Food safety for the 21st century. JAMA 2008;300:957-9. - PubMed
-
- Harris JL, Pomeranz JL, Lobstein T, Brownell KD. A crisis in the marketplace: how food marketing contributes to childhood obesity and what can be done. Ann Rev Public Health 2009;30:211-25. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical