Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 1;52(9):6959-63.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7771.

Prevalence of corneal dystrophies in the United States: estimates from claims data

David C Musch  1 , Leslie M Niziol, Joshua D Stein, Roheena M Kamyar, Alan Sugar
Affiliations

Prevalence of corneal dystrophies in the United States: estimates from claims data

David C Musch et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. .

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of corneal dystrophies.

Methods: Records of almost 8 million enrollees in a national managed-care network throughout the United States who had an eye care visit in 2001 to 2009 were searched for a recording of corneal dystrophy on a claim submitted by an ophthalmologist or optometrist from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2007.

Results: Unique individuals (n = 27,372) received two or more diagnoses of any type of corneal dystrophy, for an overall corneal dystrophy prevalence rate of 897 per million (10⁶) covered lives. Endothelial and anterior corneal dystrophies accounted for most of the reported dystrophies, and granular corneal dystrophy was the least common, being reported in 167 enrollees. Age, sex, and race variations among the various corneal dystrophies were observed. The mean age of those with macular corneal dystrophy (47.3 years) was 15 years younger than the age of those with endothelial dystrophy (62.9 years), and females were most highly represented (68.5%) among those with lattice corneal dystrophy. Hispanics and blacks were underrepresented relative to enrollees undergoing eye care for reasons other than corneal dystrophy. Keratoplasty was most frequently coded among those with lattice dystrophy.

Conclusions: Although caveats must be considered in using claims data to estimate prevalence in a population, these data provide an indication of corneal dystrophy's prevalence within insured subjects across the United States. Variations in age, sex, and race, within and between the different types of corneal dystrophies, raise questions that warrant further study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram showing selection of corneal dystrophy cases within the InVisionDataMart i3 database (Ingenix, Eden Prairie, MN). CD, corneal dystrophy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Duke-Elder S. System of Ophthalmology. Vol. 8 1965:921
    1. Sutphin JE. ed. Basic and Clinical Sciences Course: External Diseases and Cornea. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2008
    1. Weiss JS, Moller HU, Lisch W, et al. The ICD3 classification of the corneal dystrophies. Cornea. 2008;27(suppl 2):S1–S83 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Physician International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9CM); 9th revision, Clinical Modification Volume 1 and 2 Chicago, IL: American Medical Association Press; 2006
    1. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT 2006), Professional Edition. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association Press; 2006

Publication types