Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct 1;108(7):943-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.05.023. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

Effect of living alone on patient outcomes after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effect of living alone on patient outcomes after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction

Emily M Bucholz et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Considerable attention has been devoted to the effect of social support on patient outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, little is known about the relation between patient living arrangements and outcomes. Thus, we used data from PREMIER, a registry of patients hospitalized with AMI at 19 United States centers from 2003 through 2004, to assess the association of living alone with outcomes after AMI. Outcome measurements included 4-year mortality, 1-year readmission, and 1-year health status using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Short Form-12 Physical Health Component scales. Patients who lived alone had higher crude 4-year mortality (21.8% vs 14.5%, p <0.001) but comparable rates of 1-year readmission (41.6% vs 38.3%, p = 0.79). Living alone was associated with lower unadjusted quality of life (mean SAQ -2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.44 to -0.35, p = 0.02) but had no impact on Short Form-12 Physical Health Component (-0.45, 95% CI -1.65 to 0.76, p = 0.47) compared to patients who did not live alone. After multivariable adjustment, patients who lived alone had a comparable risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.93) and readmission (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.28) as patients who lived with others. Mean quality-of-life scores remained lower in patients who lived alone (SAQ -2.91, 95% CI -5.56 to -0.26, p = 0.03). In conclusion, living alone may be associated with poorer angina-related quality of life 1 year after MI but is not associated with mortality, readmission, or other health status measurements after adjusting for other patient and treatment characteristics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nielsen KM, Faergeman O, Larsen ML, Foldspang Danish singles have a twofold risk of acute coronary syndrome: data from a cohort of 138,290 persons. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:721–728. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Case RB. Living alone after myocardial infarction: impact on prognosis. JAMA. 1992;267(4):515–519. - PubMed
    1. O’Shea JC. Comparison of outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction when living alone versus those not living alone. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(12):1374–1377. - PubMed
    1. Spertus JA, Peterson E, Rumsfeld JS, Jones PG, Decker C, Krumholz HM. The Prospective Registry Evaluating Myocardial Infarction: Events and Recovery (PREMIER) - Evaluating the impact of myocardial infarction on patient outcomes. Am Heart J. 2006;151:589–597. - PubMed
    1. Enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease patients (ENRICHD) study design and methods. The ENRICHD investigators. Am Heart J. 2000;139:1–9. - PubMed

Publication types