Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular disease prevention in whole populations: modelling study
- PMID: 21798967
- PMCID: PMC3145836
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4044
Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of cardiovascular disease prevention in whole populations: modelling study
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the potential cost effectiveness of a population-wide risk factor reduction programme aimed at preventing cardiovascular disease.
Design: Economic modelling analysis.
Setting: England and Wales. Population Entire population. Model Spreadsheet model to quantify the reduction in cardiovascular disease over a decade, assuming the benefits apply consistently for men and women across age and risk groups.
Main outcome measures: Cardiovascular events avoided, quality adjusted life years gained, and savings in healthcare costs for a given effectiveness; estimates of how much it would be worth spending to achieve a specific outcome.
Results: A programme across the entire population of England and Wales (about 50 million people) that reduced cardiovascular events by just 1% would result in savings to the health service worth at least £30m (€34m; $48m) a year compared with no additional intervention. Reducing mean cholesterol concentrations or blood pressure levels in the population by 5% (as already achieved by similar interventions in some other countries) would result in annual savings worth at least £80m to £100m. Legislation or other measures to reduce dietary salt intake by 3 g/day (current mean intake approximately 8.5 g/day) would prevent approximately 30,000 cardiovascular events, with savings worth at least £40m a year. Legislation to reduce intake of industrial trans fatty acid by approximately 0.5% of total energy content might gain around 570,000 life years and generate NHS savings worth at least £230m a year.
Conclusions: Any intervention that achieved even a modest population-wide reduction in any major cardiovascular risk factor would produce a net cost saving to the NHS, as well as improving health. Given the conservative assumptions used in this model, the true benefits would probably be greater.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at
Comment in
-
Prevention: Small reductions in risk factors equal big savings in health-care costs.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Aug 16;8(10):541. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.127. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21844914 No abstract available.
-
Take dietary truths with a pinch of salt.BMJ. 2011 Aug 22;343:d5346. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5346. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21859794 No abstract available.
-
Cardiovascular prevention may increase healthcare and other costs.BMJ. 2011 Sep 6;343:d5622. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5622. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21896597 No abstract available.
References
-
- British Heart Foundation. Heart statistics. 2011. www.Heartstats.org.uk.
-
- Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004;364:937-52. - PubMed
-
- Department of Health. Putting prevention first—vascular checks: risk assessment and management. DH, 2008.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical