Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;61(589):e484-91.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X588457.

Holding relationships in primary care: a qualitative exploration of doctors' and patients' perceptions

Simon Cocksedge  1 , Rebecca Greenfield, G Kelly Nugent, Carolyn Chew-Graham
Affiliations

Holding relationships in primary care: a qualitative exploration of doctors' and patients' perceptions

Simon Cocksedge et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Ongoing doctor-patient relationships are integral to the patient-centred ideals of UK general practice, particularly for patients with chronic conditions or complex health problems. 'Holding', a doctor-patient relationship defined as establishing and maintaining a trusting, constant, reliable relationship that is concerned with ongoing support without expectation of cure, has previously been suggested as a management strategy for such patients.

Aim: To explore urban GPs' and patients' experiences of the management of chronic illness, with a particular focus on holding relationships.

Design and setting: A qualitative study in urban and suburban areas of north west England.

Method: Participating GPs recruited registered patients with chronic illness with whom they felt they had established a holding relationship. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and subjected to constant comparative qualitative analysis.

Results: GP responders considered holding to be a small but routine part of their work. Benefits described included providing support to patients but also containing demands on secondary care. Patient responders, all with complex ongoing needs, described the relationship with their GP as a reassuring, positive, and securing partnership. Both GP and patient responders emphasised the importance of pre-existing knowledge of past life-story, and valued holding as a potential tool for changing health-related behaviour. Difficulties with holding work included fears of dependency, and problems of access.

Conclusion: Holding relationships are a routine part of general practice, valued by both GPs and patients. Naming and valuing holding work may legitimise this activity in the management of people with chronic and complex health problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness. 2nd edn. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1963.
    1. McWhinney I. Continuity of care. J Fam Pract. 1982;15(5):847–848. - PubMed
    1. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Fam Pract. 2000;51(7):1087–1110. - PubMed
    1. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. BMJ. 2001;322(7284):468–472. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen J, Gay B, Crebolder H, et al. The European definition of general practice/family medicine. Barcelona: The European Society of General Practice/Family Medicine; 2002. for The European Society of General Practice/Family Medicine (WONCA Europe)