Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 16;29(40):6941-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.075. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

Identification of Francisella tularensis outer membrane protein A (FopA) as a protective antigen for tularemia

Affiliations

Identification of Francisella tularensis outer membrane protein A (FopA) as a protective antigen for tularemia

Anthony J Hickey et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Francisella tularensis is a highly pathogenic gram negative bacterium that infects multiple sites in a host, including the skin and the respiratory tract, which can lead to the onset of a deadly disease with a 50% mortality rate. The live vaccine strain (LVS) of F. tularensis, while attenuated in humans but still virulent in mice, is not an option for vaccine use in the United States due to safety concerns, and currently no FDA approved vaccine exists. The purpose of the present work was to assess the ability of recombinant Francisella outer membrane protein A (FopA) to induce a protective response in mice. The gene encoding FopA from F. tularensis LVS was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. The resulting recombinant protein was affinity-purified from the E. coli outer membrane, incorporated into liposomes and administered to mice via multiple routes. FopA-immunized mice produced FopA-specific antibodies and were protected against both lethal intradermal and intranasal challenges with F. tularensis LVS. The vaccinated mice had reduced bacterial numbers in their lungs, livers and spleens during infection, and complete bacterial clearance was observed by day 28 post infection. Passive transfer of FopA-immune serum protected naïve mice against lethal F. tularensis LVS challenge, showing that humoral immunity played an important role in vaccine efficacy. FopA-immunization was unable to protect against challenge with the fully virulent SchuS4 strain of F. tularensis; however, the findings demonstrate proof of principle that an immune response generated against a component of a subunit vaccine is protective against lethal respiratory and intradermal tularemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Expression and purification of rFopA
A. Coomassie-stained polyacrylamide gel of rFopA-expressing E. coli BL21(DE3)omp8 preparations. The fraction tested is indicated above the gel. Arrows indicate the FopA/DsbA fusion protein. B. Coomassie-stained polyacrylamide gel of the Triton X-114 and Sarkosyl-soluble fractions bound to Ni-NTA beads, before and after thrombin treatment, and the purified FopA protein obtained after thrombin cleavage. “Boiled” samples were heated in SDS loading buffer for 10 min before being loaded onto the polyacrylamide gel, while “RT” samples were left at room temp. “Induced” samples were derived from bacteria incubated in the presence of 0.3 mM IPTG, while “Uninduced” samples were derived from bacteria that were incubated in the absence of IPTG.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Antibody responses in mice immunized with liposomal rFopA
A. ELISA results showing the reactivity of either FopA immune sera, or sera collected from mice receiving sham immunizations with empty liposomes, with wells coated with rFopA. Each line represents the binding curve of an individual mouse. B. ELISA results showing the reactivity of sera from liposomal rFopA-immunized mice with wells coated with wildtype F. tularensis LVS (top) or F. tularensis LVS fopA:Tn5 mutant (bottom). Each line represents the binding curve of an individual mouse. C. Western blot (left) and coomassie-stained polyacrylamide gel (right) analysis of reactivity of pooled anti-rFopA serum against wildtype and fopA:Tn5 LVS cell lysates. 3μg of total protein from each lysate were loaded into each well. The PAGE analysis of the samples demonstrates equal loading of protein in each lane.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Protection of rFopA-immunized mice from lethal LVS infection
A. Survival of unvaccinated C57BL/6 mice or mice immunized with a sublethal dose of F.tularensis LVS, or with liposomal rFopA after i.d. challenge with a lethal dose of F. tularensis LVS. Challenge was performed 35 days after the final immunization. The FopA-vaccinated and unvaccinated groups consisted of 5 and 6 mice, respectively, while the LVS-immune group consisted of 3 mice. B. Survival of C57BL/6 mice immunized with either 108 CFU of UV-fixed F. tularensis LVS, liposomal FopA, or empty liposomes, after i.n challenge with F. tularensis. Challenge was performed 21 days after the final immunization. Each group consisted of 8 mice. C. Survival of unvaccinated C57BL/6 mice or mice immunized with liposomal rFopA after i.d. challenge with a lethal dose of F. tularensis SchuS4. The FopA-vaccinated and unvaccinated groups consisted of 4 and 5 mice, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Bacterial burdens in lungs, livers, and spleens following infection
Mice were immunized with liposomal rFopA or empty liposomes in the presence of IL-12 as adjuvant and mean CFU were measured in the indicated tissues on days 1, 5, and 7 post i.n challenge. The error bars represent standard deviation from groups of 5-6 mice.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Protection by passive transfer of anti-rFopA antiserum
Survival curves of BALB/c mice that were injected i.p. with 250 μl of pooled F. tularensis LVS-immune serum, FopA-immune serum or normal serum. Serum injections were performed 24 hrs before and 24 hrs after i.d. challenge with 2LD50 of F. tularensis LVS. Each group consisted of 5 mice.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oyston PC, Sjostedt A, Titball RW. Tularaemia: bioterrorism defense renews interest in Francisella tularensis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:967–78. - PubMed
    1. Ellis J, Oyston PC, Green M, Titball RW. Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:631–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pechous RD, McCarthy TR, Zahrt TC. Working toward the future: insights into Francisella tularensis pathogenesis and vaccine development. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;73:684–711. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salinas LJ, Greenfield RA, Little SE, Voskuhl GW. Tickborne infections in the southern United States. Am J Med Sci. 2010;340:194–201. - PubMed
    1. Larsson P, Oyston PC, Chain P, Chu MC, Duffield M, Fuxelius HH, et al. The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia. Nat Genet. 2005;37:153–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms